Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!

On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 1:34:45 +0000, Ross Finlayson wrote:

On 11/22/2024 01:03 PM, rhertz wrote:

On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 20:30:39 +0000, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
>
<snip all the history of your life. You didn't read my disclaimer>
>
>

Bottom line:
It doesn't matter how you put energy into a closed cavity.
In the cavity there will be a black body radiation with
temperature equal to the temperature of the walls.
>
The reflectivity, albedo or colour of the inner surface
of the cavity are irrelevant. The radiation in the cavity
will always be black body radiation.
>
Make a hole in your cavity, and you have a perfect
black body radiation source.
>
Its temperature will not be very high, though-
>

>
Now smile, asshole.

>
:-D

>
It is not a BB radiation source!
>
You ignored the fact that the heat goes away from the cavity. It doesn't
remain neither inside nor outside. It's eliminated by cooling
mechanisms, as I wrote as an initial condition. Read all the posts.
>
There is no light energy left within the cavity, nor heat energy outside
it. You better think again about it.
>
You also ignored my post apologizing to all people that participated in
this thread. That makes you a bigger ASSHOLE than what I thought.
>
Now, start thinking in my NEXT IDEA:
>
Willing to try to prove/disprove E=mc² at a macroscopic level, I'll
think of an experiment that incorporates electromagnetic oscillations
passing through the cavity, which will be converted in a CAPACITOR, by
cutting it in halves and isolating them with a thin ring.
>
What I propose to MEASURE is the changes in the frequency of the LC
oscillator, within a time window of about 3 msec, which repeats
permanently.
>
I'll use a relationship between mass and capacitance for the cavity,
with frequency around 1 Mhz or greater.
>
>
It was a failed idea for an experiment, but there are OTHER WAYS to
check E=mc² at a macroscopic level, without resorting to nuclear energy
crap (Kg evaporated vs. energy provided), or else.
>
Ask ChatGPT:
>
>
any other non-relativistic means to prove E=mc^2?
or
Is there any way to prove E=mc^2 at higher level than quantum?
or
can I use electrostatic energy?
>
>
The last one gave interesting insights. Ask to it sequentially the above
lines.
>
>
>
Keep smiling, asshole.

>
>
In more civil times we'd just say, "see you later, alligator",
then the other fellow would say, "in a while, crocodile".
>
Swearing was considered something trash did,
or perhaps someone who just stubbed themselves.
>
Toss your prayer-booth this "super-imposed neutral linac
and charged cyclotron, measuring while switching on
and off, each" and see what results. Here if I posed it
to the large language model, then I'd also prompt it
reasons what to provide the configuration and energy
of experiment, and have here a book detailing the
principles of construction.
>
This is where Einstein's second-mass famous mass-energy
equivalence derivation arrives at this from fundamentally
different principles for the nominally (at least) non-linear
and furthermore the formally rotating, setting.
>
And some people even dare to think that "infinity"
isn't a natural unit, ....

We live in harsh times and victorian language has lost any meaning.
You should know a bit more about Argentina and the current far right
president, who has a viper and dirty tongue every fucking day, attacking
the opposition. He's grooming a "praetorian guard" of young followers,
who insult everyone, every day through social media and streaming.
Sometimes calling asshole to an asshole has more scientific meaning than
E=mc2. And Paul enters into this category. He's unable to accept any
mistake and, if he takes any offense, disappear for a while, expecting
that his assholeness be forgotten.
He has some traits like the infamous Dono, who changed what you wrote
and pretend it's done by you. Also, he lied and distorted writings many
times to get going with his agenda.
Many times I write, on purpose, calculations and wait for him to take
the bait. I smile thinking how much I make him work with details,
because it's the way he is. He can't accept that I'm trolling him.
It's like going to fish. Requires patience, but finally he will bite.