Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!
De : hertz778 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (rhertz)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 27. Nov 2024, 02:22:42
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <9c2a3620b1b5f5700f14831366a5e8ce@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
Pièces jointes : Steradians.png (image/png)
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:44:18 +0000, ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog wrote:

On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 22:07:31 +0000, rhertz wrote:

<snip>

You are mixing different concepts of the theories around BBC.
>
I invite you to read the history of developments in BBC radiation, which
I wrote in 2019, and that end with Planck's discovery of h.
>
Thermal Radiation, Black Body Theory and the Birth of Quantum Physics
>
https://physictheories.blogspot.com/2019/
>
>
Read the last part, about RADIOMETRY, and the definitions of:
>
Spectral Radiant Energy inside a cavity: The original formulae u and E
from Planck. THESE ARE THE ORIGINAL PLANCK'S FORMULAE INSIDE THE BBC.
>
>
Spectral Radiant Exitance Me(𝜆,T) at the aperture in the cavity: THIS IS
WHAT YOU USED.
>
No, I was calculating energy density, assuming the black body nature
of the radiation. Read again that section of the Wikipedia article
that I provided you a link for.
>
IT'S THE ENERGY THAT FLOWS OUT OF THE BBC, THROUGH A
HOLE. This was what was ACTUALLY MEASURED at the BPT, whose physicists
provided ESSENTIAL INFORMATION to Planck in October 1900. He had two
months left to present his paper at the German Physics Society on
December 14, 1900 (date considered the birth of quantum physics).
>
IRRADIANCE is measured outside the BBC, and the factor c/4 allowed the
use of Planck's formula to measurements and calculations in astronomy.
NOR HIM NEITHER WIEN DERIVED SUCH EQUATION. It was derived AFTER THEM,
by physicists working in RADIOMETRY.


You are wrong having such attitude of denial about NOT READING the
Radiometry part of my link.

It speaks volumes about your stubbornness in NOT ACCEPTING that you were
wrong using such Stefan's modified formula.

The Wiki article is a pile of crap, no less. Using Stefan's law modified
to compute broadband irradiance in a closed cavity IS BEYOND STUPIDITY.


You weren't calculating energy density, assuming the black body nature
of the radiation. You did copy an ill-written link which used Stefan's
law multiplied by 4/c, which is A FACTOR USED in Spectral Radiant
Exitance Me(𝜆,T) at the aperture in the BB cavity.

Now, if you want TO DENY the knowledge that Radiometry provides, science
that has more than 130 years of accumulated experience, then you're just
in denial about the history of thermodynamics and applied physics.

I don't claim, not even close, to be knowledgeable in thermodynamics.

What I wrote in 2019 was MY FIRST ATTEMPT to publish something in a
blog. By then, I was curious about the origins of quantum physics, and I
collected and published information about the developments in the
understanding of what RADIANT HEAT was. Nothing more, nothing less.

I was too lazy to continue with other stories about advances in physics,
so I stop right there. I'm not a kind of person that need to publish
papers to satisfy my ego. I did it, for many years, in journals
specialized in defense, but I was almost forced to communicate such
content in specialized media. Never liked it. I like results, not blah,
blah, blah,....


Having you a PhD in Molecular Biology (or similar), I find it shocking
that you be so mind closed. One thing is stubbornness to defend your
position, but with an open mind, and other thing is you persisting in
YOUR INTERPRETATION of issues, negating ANY CHANCE to review your
position. That's very wrong, and it's far from what I am and I practice.


//////////////////////////////////////////////////

Here are dome of the SI (MKS) radiometry units that you should know
better:

1. Qe: Radiant Energy (Joule): Energy of electromagnetic radiation.


2. Φe: Radiant Flux (Watt): Radiant energy per unit time. It is
sometimes called "radiant power".


3. Spectral Radiant Energy inside a cavity: The original formulae u and
E from Planck.

Wu(ʋ,T) = u = 8𝜋hʋ^3c^-3(e^(hʋ/kT)-1)^-1   [units:  Joule.m^-3/Hz]

We(𝜆,T) = E = 8𝜋hc𝜆^-5(e(ch/k𝜆T)-1)^-1     [units:  Joule.m^-3. 𝜇m^-1]


4. Spectral Radiant Exitance Me(𝜆,T) at the aperture in the cavity:

Radiant exitance of a surface per unit wavelength (or frequency). This
is sometimes also confusingly called "spectral intensity".

Me(𝜆,T) = (c/4).We𝜆(𝜆,T)      [units:  Watt.m^-2.m^-1]


5. Monochromatic Irradiance or Spectral Flux Density at the aperture in
the cavity:

Radiance of a surface per unit frequency or wavelength per unit solid
angle. A directional quantity and differs from Planck's formula by
(c/4𝜋). This is sometimes confusingly called "spectral intensity".

Lʋ(ʋ,T) = (c/4𝜋).Wu(ʋ,T)    [units:  Watt.m^-2.Hz^-1.sr^-1]

Le(𝜆,T) = (c/4𝜋).We𝜆(𝜆,T)   [units:  Watt.m^-2.𝜇m^-1.sr^-1]


6. Flux Density or Irradiance Ee (Watt.m^-2): Radiant flux received by a
surface per unit area. This is sometimes confusingly called "intensity".


7. Radiance Le,Ω(Watt.m^-2.sr^-1): Radiant flux emitted, reflected,
transmitted or received by a surface, per unit projected area per unit
solid angle. This is a directional quantity. This is sometimes also
confusingly called "intensity".


*********************************************

You (due to Wikipedia) are wrongfully using THIS:

4. Spectral Radiant Exitance Me(𝜆,T) at the aperture in the cavity


Me(𝜆,T) = (c/4).We𝜆(𝜆,T)

but integrating it across the entire spectrum (in 𝜆 units), what would
give A MODIFIED STEFAN'S LAW! And this is INCORRECT, and doesn't exist.


You are accepting to integrate THE OUTPUT of the BBC through a small
orifice, energy that propagates toward INFINITY. Will you get it now?




I attach a drawing that explain why the factor 4 appears when the entire
surface of a sphere is computed in terms of solid angles (steradians).
The whole sphere covers 4𝜋 sr solid angle, in open space. The use of c
is just a convention for radiant energy velocity.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
17 Nov 24 * Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!93rhertz
17 Nov 24 +* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!85LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Nov 24 i`* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!84rhertz
17 Nov 24 i `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!83gharnagel
17 Nov 24 i  `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!82rhertz
17 Nov 24 i   `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!81gharnagel
18 Nov 24 i    `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!80rhertz
18 Nov 24 i     +- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
18 Nov 24 i     `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!78gharnagel
18 Nov 24 i      `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!77rhertz
18 Nov 24 i       +* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!73gharnagel
18 Nov 24 i       i+* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!3rhertz
18 Nov 24 i       ii+- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1rhertz
19 Nov 24 i       ii`- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1gharnagel
19 Nov 24 i       i`* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!69ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
19 Nov 24 i       i `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!68rhertz
19 Nov 24 i       i  `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!67ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
19 Nov 24 i       i   +* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!65gharnagel
19 Nov 24 i       i   i`* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!64ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
19 Nov 24 i       i   i `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!63gharnagel
19 Nov 24 i       i   i  `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!62ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
20 Nov 24 i       i   i   +* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!2rhertz
20 Nov 24 i       i   i   i`- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
20 Nov 24 i       i   i   +* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!2rhertz
20 Nov 24 i       i   i   i`- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
20 Nov 24 i       i   i   `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!57ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
20 Nov 24 i       i   i    `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!56rhertz
20 Nov 24 i       i   i     +* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!15ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
20 Nov 24 i       i   i     i`* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!14rhertz
20 Nov 24 i       i   i     i +- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
20 Nov 24 i       i   i     i `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!12rhertz
20 Nov 24 i       i   i     i  `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!11ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
20 Nov 24 i       i   i     i   +* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!2ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
20 Nov 24 i       i   i     i   i`- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
20 Nov 24 i       i   i     i   +* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!7rhertz
20 Nov 24 i       i   i     i   i`* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!6ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
20 Nov 24 i       i   i     i   i `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!5rhertz
20 Nov 24 i       i   i     i   i  `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!4ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
21 Nov 24 i       i   i     i   i   `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!3rhertz
21 Nov 24 i       i   i     i   i    `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!2ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
21 Nov 24 i       i   i     i   i     `- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
21 Nov 24 i       i   i     i   `- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1Thomas Heger
20 Nov 24 i       i   i     +* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!3gharnagel
20 Nov 24 i       i   i     i`* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!2ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
20 Nov 24 i       i   i     i `- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1gharnagel
22 Nov 24 i       i   i     `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!37rhertz
22 Nov 24 i       i   i      +* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!27rhertz
22 Nov 24 i       i   i      i`* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!26ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
22 Nov 24 i       i   i      i `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!25Ross Finlayson
22 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  +* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!22rhertz
22 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i+- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
24 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i`* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!20rhertz
24 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!19ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
24 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i  `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!18rhertz
24 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i   `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!17ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
25 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i    `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!16rhertz
26 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i     +* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!4ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
26 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i     i`* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!3rhertz
26 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i     i `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!2ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
26 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i     i  `- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
26 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i     `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!11ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
26 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i      `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!10rhertz
26 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i       `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!9ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
27 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i        `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!8rhertz
27 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i         `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!7ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
27 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i          `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!6rhertz
27 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i           `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!5ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
28 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i            `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!4rhertz
28 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i             +* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!2Ross Finlayson
28 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i             i`- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
29 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i             `- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1rhertz
22 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!2Ross Finlayson
22 Nov 24 i       i   i      i   `- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1Ross Finlayson
22 Nov 24 i       i   i      `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!9rhertz
23 Nov 24 i       i   i       +* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!5Ross Finlayson
23 Nov 24 i       i   i       i+- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1rhertz
23 Nov 24 i       i   i       i`* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!3Ross Finlayson
23 Nov 24 i       i   i       i `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!2Ross Finlayson
27 Nov 24 i       i   i       i  `- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1Ross Finlayson
23 Nov 24 i       i   i       `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!3ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
11 Dec 24 i       i   i        `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!2Tom Roberts
11 Dec 24 i       i   i         `- Re: Want to prove E=mc?? University labs should try this!1J. J. Lodder
19 Nov 24 i       i   `- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1rhertz
19 Nov 24 i       `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!3ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
19 Nov 24 i        `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!2Ross Finlayson
19 Nov 24 i         `- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1Ross Finlayson
17 Nov 24 +* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!2Ross Finlayson
18 Nov 24 i`- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1Ross Finlayson
17 Nov 24 +* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!2LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Nov 24 i`- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1Ross Finlayson
17 Nov 24 +- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1rhertz
17 Nov 24 +- Re: Want to prove E=mc?? University labs should try this!1J. J. Lodder
11 Dec 24 `- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1LaurenceClarkCrossen

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal