Re: Why a time of the real world must be galilean

W dniu 10.12.2024 o 19:04, Python pisze:

Le 10/12/2024 à 09:50, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 10.12.2024 o 07:51, Python pisze:

Le 09/12/2024 à 22:54, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 09.12.2024 o 07:37, Python pisze:

Le 09/12/2024 à 05:25, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 08.12.2024 o 21:07, Python pisze:

[snip demented rant]
>
So, Woz, given two clocks how do you practically check if they are synchronized

>
Practical checking, poor stinker, means: not
sticking to some Holy Procedures invented by an
idiot guru in some medieval ages.
>
Practical solutions are made by local observers
considering their best knowledge AND the details
of their specific situation.
>
You're not going to predict them from a nice
armchair in your nice office. Or, at least,
you're not going to predict them correctly.
Face it, poor stinker.

>
A lot of rants and insults, but still no practical procedure.

>
In oppolsition to [SR] [snip rant]

>
SR provides a practical procedure.

>
>
Really? Are you able to apply it on Earth surface?
How about GPS?

 Before considering GPS, consider only two clocks.

No answer. Of course, poor stinker.
  Before dealing with

complex stuff, let's start with simple stuff.
 How do you practically check your "t = t'" equations for clocks standing > next to each other?

I read the numbers they display and I compare them.
Then for distant mutually at rest clocks with no

gravity involved?

I don't. Not interested in some sick
delusions imagined by an insane, mumbling
inconsistently idiot.

 Then we could consider more complex setup.
 

Quite the opposite: your rant remains inconsistent rumbling

>
I've provided a direct proof and your rants
are changing nothing, poor stinker.

 Maciej, you couldn't recognize what a "proof" is

Python, I derived a direct prof and some
poor fanatic idiots ranting, spitting
and slandering are changing nothing.