Re: "not even trying: the corruption of real science"

On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 12:50:38 +0000, Paul B. Andersen wrote:

Den 11.12.2024 02:25, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:

"In his memoirs Count Harry Kessler records some conversations with
Einstein, including one where he asked the point-blank question : do
your theories relate to the atomic components? And receive the equally
blunt answer ‘no’. Einstein gave his opinion that objects on such a
small scale would not be covered by his theory (See ‘Diaries of a
Cosmopolitan’ by Kessler, entry for Monday 14th Feb 1921)" [Newton, Zak.
WAS EINSTEIN WRONG? . The Electronic Book Company. Kindle Edition.]

>
Yes, Einstein was wrong when he thought that SR wouldn't
be applicable for "atomic components" such as electrons.
>
QED is based on SR.

That remains to be demonstrated. Quantum physics is still hobbled by SR
but is trying to free itself from time dilation.