Sujet : Re: Why the time kept at the ISS is UTC? And Einstein's time?
De : mlwozniak (at) *nospam* wp.pl (Maciej Wozniak)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 12. Dec 2024, 20:37:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-ID : <181085297483eef4$3637$1228337$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
W dniu 12.12.2024 o 20:26, Paul B. Andersen pisze:
If the "atomic clock" is an SI-clock, this is wrong.
But atomic clocks are not SI clocks, anyone can check GPS.
Your bunch of idiots has no power to enforce your
idiocies on the reality.
SI-clocks always run at the rate one second per second (1Hz).
Wrong; that's true that they run one (second of a
relativistic idiot) per (second of a relativistic idiot),
but seconds are something else.
Inferring that time runs at a different rate is absurd.
Right!
In physics, "time" must be measurable.
The instrument we use to measure "time" is by definition "a clock".
A lie, as expected from relativistic scum. There
is no such definition; and the main purpose of a
clock is unrelated to your moronic physics. You
only imagine you're the center the world is
spinning around.
A second of "time" always lasts a second.
But an SI second lasts a second on earth and
(9,192,631,770/9,192,631,774) of a second in
a GPS satellite; anyone can check that.