Re: "not even trying: the corruption of real science"

Paul B. Andersen <relativity@paulba.no> wrote:

Den 11.12.2024 18:27, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:

On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 12:50:38 +0000, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
 

>
QED is based on SR.

 

That remains to be demonstrated.

 
Does this mean that you are ignorant of the fact
that Quantum Electrodynamics unites quantum physics
and relativity?
 

Quantum physics is still hobbled by SR
but is trying to free itself from time dilation.

 
Can you please explain what this statement means?
 
How is Quantum Mechanics (Bohr & co) "hobbled by SR",
and how is quantum mechanics trying to free itself
from time dilation?
 
I know you won't answer.
You never try to defend your ridiculous claims.

Ridiculous indeed, already for the Old Quantum Mechanics.
Sommerfeld for example applied relativity to the Bohr atom
to obtain correct results for some of the fine structure.

You are so ignorant of the most basic physics
that you babble meaningless statements like above.

Not just ignorant of basic physics,
also in ignorance of much of the history of it,

Jan