Liste des Groupes | Revenir à p relativity |
W dniu 15.12.2024 o 10:53, Python pisze:There's "apparent superluminal motion" then though thatLe 12/12/2024 à 04:37, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :>W dniu 11.12.2024 o 22:51, Python pisze:>Le 11/12/2024 à 22:18, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :>W dniu 11.12.2024 o 21:56, Python pisze:>Le 11/12/2024 à 21:29, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :>W dniu 11.12.2024 o 20:17, Python pisze:>Le 11/12/2024 à 08:17, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :>W dniu 10.12.2024 o 20:45, Python pisze:>Le 10/12/2024 à 20:20, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :>...>How do you practically check your "t = t'" equations for>
clocks standing next to each other?
I read the numbers they display and I compare them.
Good.
>Then for distant mutually at rest clocks with no>gravity involved?>
I don't.
Sad. You don't. You can't. We can.
No you can't either. Sorry, There is a small technical detail:
those
"distant clocks" are not moving wrt each
other.
How do you ensure that? By assuming the
condition a priori;and you can do it because
you're only applying your procedure
in your gedanken. Am I incorrect ?
You are. I put two clocks at the extremity of a rod.
Yeah, sure - "distant" clocks at the
extremity of the rod - very practical
indeed, isn't it?
>
>
This is quitereasonable to assume they are at rest wrt to each other, isn't it?>
No. Take 2 bodies - one orbitting the other.
Join them with a rod, do you secure their relative
immobility ? Yeah, you imagined and insisted
Gdańsk and Warsaw aren't moving wrt each other. You're
such an idiot.
What is the relative speed between Gdansk and Warsaw then?
Would have to calculate.
LOL!!!
OK, if you ask.
From wiki - Gdańsk is 54°20′51″N 18°38′43″E,
Warsaw is 52°13′56″N 21°00′30″E.
Assuming the average Earth radius 6368km, Gdańsk
is 3713.3km distant from Earth axis, Warsaw is
3901.5km. That gives 972.1km/h and 1021.4km/h
of linear speed. The difference is 49.3km/h.
Good enough for you as the first estimation,
poor stinker?
Sure, the velocities are not quite parallel;
the final result will be slightly bigger.
>
>
>
>
>>>
>>>>>You're only believing [into] a great>
practical procedure - because your is pumping you with gedanken
fairy
tales where it works fine.
Nope. If such a procedure would fail it could be checked.
How could it fail if you have never used it.
>
>No magic, and if gravity could not be ignored in a given>
practical setup
So, where, precisely, was your [method]
applied. In practice.
I asked for yours
And I asked where, precisely, was your idiocy
applied. In practice.
No answer? Of course,
Many labs where distant events are involved and high time resolution
is > needed, inside CERN detectors for instance.
The source?
http://ttc.web.cern.ch/LEB00Sync.pdf
But the document is signed "Varela, J", not
"Einstein, A", poor stinker. And it's definitely
far, far, far more elaborate than the "masterpiece"
of your idiot guru.
>
>
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.