Re: Relativistic synchronisation method

Le 17/12/2024 à 18:57, Python a écrit :

This is necessarily true

 So why don't you stop suggesting otherwise by claiming that it is not said for who "A marks tA/t'A" or "B marks tB"?
 Are you playing being an idiot or are really an idiot? (I know the answer).

But that's not true, damn it...
He still hasn't understood.
I'M TALKING ABOUT THE OTHER watch.
If when my watch says NOON when I hit that tree on the side of the road, it's obvious that all observers in the universe will understand that MY watch says noon at that moment of impact.
MY watch.
Breathe, blow, I'll say it again: "MY watch says noon".
It's not hard to understand, it's at kindergarten level, and even little Stephanie, who is six years old and in CP,
she understands it.
That's one thing.
But now the tremendous slap in the face will come quickly, and we go from CP (6 years old) to Bac+15.
On other watches, even perfectly tuned according to the Eisntein procedure, which is a type M procedure (described by Hachel), it is NOT noon.
In their own hyperplane of simultaneity, they consider that at this present moment for them, MY watch is indeed marking noon, but NOT theirs.
Okay, are you starting to see the concept of universal anisochrony by positional change?
R.H.