Re: Criticism of the basis of the general relativity theory

rhertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 19:34:57 +0000, rhertz wrote:
 

Check this out:

Woof! WoofWoof!!

<snip>
 
There may be some confusion with the principle of correspondence, as
it's used also in philosophy.
 
I meant this principle of correspondence, from quantum physics:
 
 
https://www.britannica.com/science/correspondence-principle
 
QUOTE:
 
Correspondence principle, philosophical guideline for the selection of
new theories in physical science, requiring that they explain all the
phenomena for which a preceding theory was valid.

Nobody ever needed Niels Bohr for that.
(apart from it often being false)

Formulated in 1923 by the Danish physicist Niels Bohr, this principle is a
distillation of the thought that had led him in the development of his
atomic theory, an early form of quantum mechanics.

Nonsense. Special relativity, 1905, and general relativity, 1915,
had, and have no need for this Bohrian obscurantism with respect to
the old quantum mechanics of 1923.
(remember that the real quantum mechanics didn't start until 1925-26)

Derivation of the non-relativistic limit of relativity
is straightforward, and it is obviously in agreement
with preceding theories, where applicable.

Jan