Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the physics of your idiot guru

Am Donnerstag000019, 19.12.2024 um 08:02 schrieb Maciej Wozniak:

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
As seen, the definition of second loved so
much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
 

Look at this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day_length_fluctuations#/media/File:Deviation_of_day_length_from_SI_day.svg
We can see, that length of the solar day is shifting by about 1 ms per day within a year.
The length of the day is also about 1 ms longer than 86400 seconds on average over the entire plot.
Would we add this 1 ms to the day, we could see, that Earth' rotation is actually speeding up occasionally, because the delta t value also goes down in recent years.
Iow: if delta t is less today than half a century ago and we had already added one or two ms to the day length, now the Earth would rotate faster than before.
This is so because in that case, the cumulative delta t curve would go down.
Another good question would be:
what causes this pronounced 1ms shift in the length of day within every single year.
This does not sound like much, but actually means, that the Earth rotation is speeding up and down significantly and with a distinct measurable pattern of 1ms per day.
Given the large mass of the Earth this would require a lot of angular momentum to be lost and gained (every single year).
Somehow I cannot believe this could happen in reality. So, the only possible explanation is, that the UTC-time itself is shifting by 1ms per day within a year (which is colossal number, if you take the assumed precision of atomic clocks into consideration).
TH