Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.2017

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.2017
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* liscati.fr.invalid (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 22. Dec 2024, 14:17:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <9ZoQ3NQtNc9qYOK6sfws2xZrqP4@jntp>
References : 1
User-Agent : Nemo/1.0
Le 22/12/2024 à 04:56, clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) a écrit :
He shows that the Maxwell equations are invariant under the Galilean
transformations making the LT invalid.
 free pdf =
 https://www.globalscientificjournal.com/researchpaper/Back-to-Galilean-Transformation-and-Newtonian-Physics-Refuting-the-Theory-of-Relativity.pdf
 "Abstract
This paper refutes the theory of relativity. Previous attempts by others
were based on pointing at contradictions between corollaries of the
theory of relativity and reality, often called paradoxes. The main point
of this article is to indicate and correct the error that led scientists
at the turn of the twentieth century to formulate the faulty theory of
relativity."
There are two great errors among those who are interested in the theory of relativity. The first is to say that everything is true and remarkably logical, the second is to say that everything is false.
The theory of relativity is like a guitar string: if you do not tighten the string, it makes a low and unpleasant sound.
But if you tighten it too much, it breaks.
Let us take the case of the half-life of accelerated particles, let us take the case of the aberration of the position of stars at the zenith. What could be clearer than that the theory is true?
But let us take the Erhenfest paradox, the Langevin paradox, and the Andromeda paradox. What could be clearer than that physicists are grotesque, and that they teach inconsistencies and grotesqueries?
The only one who stretches his rope well is Doctor Hachel, with in the end a finished theory and a great mathematical logic.
The proof that he is right: everyone spits on him (I challenge you to find a name that does not spit on him).
We do not spit on the adventures of Harry Potter, or the little house on the prairie.
And if Doctor Hachel was wrong, a single spit would be enough.
R.H.
Date Sujet#  Auteur
22 Dec04:56 * "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.201712LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Dec05:07 +- Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20171LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Dec14:17 +- Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20171Richard Hachel
22 Dec15:32 `* Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20179Paul.B.Andersen
22 Dec18:38  +- Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20171LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Dec18:56  +- Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20171LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Dec23:09  +- Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20171LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Dec01:07  +* Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20173LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Dec02:13  i`* Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20172Ross Finlayson
23 Dec04:55  i `- Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20171LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Dec01:13  +- Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20171LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Dec01:27  `- Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20171LaurenceClarkCrossen

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal