Re: How did Einstein Develop his Field Equations? When: A. He admitted having little math

Le 25/12/2024 à 23:54, neus a écrit :

Richard Hachel wrote:

Le 25/12/2024 à 20:44, clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) a écrit :

On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 19:32:36 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:

 

I hate to resort to ad hominem, but Einstein's character is unavoidably
involved. He is known to have claimed not to have known of the MMX when
he wrote his 1905 paper. He also claimed to have read before the 1905
article a lengthy 1890 article with a long discussion of the MMX by
then, thus contradicting himself. I do not regard him as honest. I
regard his theory to be as fake as it can be.

 What theory?
He spent his life copying other people's.
He was just a very average student with no ability other than copying (he was then sent to the Bern office and employed as a copyist).
 You see Henri Poincaré sent as a copyist to Bern, you?
 In my opinion, Albert Einstein was just a media creation, like Saint Paul was a creation of the Roman Empire to soften the first Christian theories by sweetening them with laughable and grotesque facts for an erudite Jew.
 An erudite Jew will immediately laugh at the idea that the good Lord came to mate with "Mary of Nazareth", a city that never existed except in the sick brains of historians, and was created out of whole cloth in the eighth century by the crusaders who were surprised not to find Nazareth on the maps.
 Albert Einstein is the same. When in 1905, the church was separated from the state, a new prophet was needed to replace the church, and someone charismatic enough to look like an old Jewish prophet.
 Albert Einstein, unable to solve an equation involving an integral, was then mandated for the role, as Rome mandated Saint Paul. --------------------------

 Saint Paul was mandated by God.

Impossible.
Too many contradictions in his behavior.
His false humility, his false miracles, his false apparition (that no one sees), his false doctrine, his prediction by Jesus Christ (that the Antichrist was already of this world and was going to manifest himself to take the place of the apostle of God, his blessing of the Empire (he benefited from the protection of 70 horsemen, and had the right to travel the empire, while the Christians were being crucified).
All this does not hold up to a second.
As for his style, it is easy to take down; he says hidden things that could be taken for mysteries, but becomes laughable in things that are not hidden, and when he says that pure souls will flutter around the good Lord, or that the eye has not seen the greatness of God, and that he uses quantities of abstract and incomprehensible terms, etc...
It is clearer than a thousand fires when you have the key.
He is obviously a nutcase who mandated himself, and whose goal was to torpedo the doctrine of Jesus Christ from within. His position is also extremely intelligent, he does not deny Jesus Christ, but distorts him from within. It is much more sordid and effective.
R.H.