Re: Argument with ChatGPT about that Pound-Rebka experiment was A FRAUD.

ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog <tomyee3@gmail.com> wrote:

On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 22:38:58 +0000, rhertz wrote:
 

My question:
>
Regarding the conclusion of the 1959 paper, It's the same as if he had
written:
>
Net shift (source at the bottom, red shifting) = (-17.6 - 2.1) x 10^-15.
Netshift (source at the top, blue shifting) = (-15.5 + 2.1) x 10^-15.
>
Clearly, it's shown that the gravitational shift exists and that can be
extracted from two sets of measurements that should have been equal.
Stop mentioning differences due to Doppler or other sources. The
experiment clearly used statistically cooked data, and NO ONE questioned
these results.

 
<snip>
 

I finally rest my case. The experiment was an HOAX, with fraudulent,
cooked data, and NOBODY DID CARE TO QUESTION THIS EXPERIMENT (under a
grant from US. MILITARY, who paid even the sandwiches and drinks for all
the staff).

 
<snip>

You clearly have been priming ChatGPT with misleading "facts" outside
of its range of knowledge. Chatbots generally assume good faith on the
part of their users. I know from observation that ChatGPT has only a
rather superficial knowledge of the details of Pound & Rebka. ChatGPT
assumed good faith on your part, that you would provide it with
accurate and fairly stated facts to fill in the gaps in its knowledge.
Instead, you deliberately fed it false information.

Why bother?
Anyone who wants to bring chatbots into physics discussions
is a complete idiot, and/or of malicious intent,

Jan