Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.

W dniu 16.01.2025 o 20:58, Python pisze:

Le 16/01/2025 à 20:49, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 16.01.2025 o 20:29, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:
>

GR's predictions for the gravitational deflection of EM-radiation

>
According to your GR shit light [in
vacuum] doesn't deflect and takes always
straight/geodesic paths.

 According to math the projection of a geodesic/straight line in a given space onto a sup-space is not necessarily a geodesic/straight line in this sub-space.

Of course, but in your moronic religion
light has some special properties, doesn't
it?
I've already asked you - if a light path is not -
HOW do you recognize a space geodesic?
Still no answer? Of course, poor stinker.
Really -  you're recognizing it by ...
having the properties of an Euclidean
straight line. But it is surely not what
your idiot guru told you you should
do to recognize it.
Or is it?
And another question: why is graviattional
lensing [according to your madness] demonstrating
non-Euclidean space and ordinary lensing
isn't?
You don't know, of course, so I will answer
for you: because a light  path in GR shit
is a straight line, so  gravitational  lensing
is violating the  axiom of "2 points - one
straight line".
There is NO light deflection in The Shit.
Poincare has been explaining. We have a
choice: either non-euclidean space with
straight light paths or euclidean space
with curved light paths. Poincare has
also said that any sane mind will choose 2.
You're not sane but you're not insane enough
to choose 1; you're only insane enough
to pretend you choose 1.