Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.

Le 16/01/2025 à 19:15, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :

"Only experimental evidence can falsify a theory."

 So you have finally learned.

This is false.
A theoretical proof can do it too.
You take the theory of special relativity, and you study it as Dr. Hachel did for forty years.
If there are eggshells in the omelette, theoretical shells, it is because the theory is not clear. I am not saying that it is false, I am saying that it is not entirely clear.
It is very easy to demonstrate but human terror being what it is it is not easy to tell certain truths. 95% of scientists panic and are terrified.
Yet it is very easily demonstrated, the RR has no chance of being true by its simple internal inconsistency concerning the Langevin paradox (poorly explained) and the fact that we cannot, for Stella in her frame of reference, see the earth coming back towards her for 9 years of her return, with a frightening apparent speed of 4c (this is the apparent speed of a body hurtling at 0.8c towards another) and this over a contraction of distances of 7.2 light years.
It is absurd.
The fact that I am the only one to lift the paradox, provoking laughter, threats, defamation and contempt, shows the extraordinary (whatever one says) intellectual crustiness of our time.
The more stupid we are, the more we appear on TV and on all the radios.
Tell the truth, and you will be immediately ostracized, including by those who should hold the scepter of rationality, but only think of their little position in the physics laboratory or on forums.
I repeat, we can make theoretical refutations if the theory has internal contradictions, and this is the case in several places (Langevin, apparent speeds, Ehrenfest paradox, proper time of accelerated objects, integrations done haphazardly, etc.)
R.H.