Re: Fun with ChatGPT: Relativity is a lucky pseudoscience that fails at atomiic level.

On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 6:59:34 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

Am Mittwoch000029, 29.01.2025 um 17:06 schrieb Bertietaylor:
>

>
Regarding GR, it started to mumble shit about quantum spacetime and
Planck's lengths and times, to later accept that IT'S BELIEVED that GR
has to have a role in atom's behavior, but immediately it added that
such area is under heavy study by several researches, and that such
influence of GR on atom's behavior IS FAR FROM BEING KNOWN BY NOW.
>
Also, added that efforts to incorporate quantum spacetime in atomic
theory have been made in the last decades without results (string
theory, quantum loop gravity, etc.). Additionally, added that a
completely new theory is needed, but there are no indications that
current proposals are going to succeed.

>
>
Well, how about my own idea?
>
It isn't that new anymore, but aims to fill that gap and base particles
on spacetime of GR.

>
Just forget the depravity of all relativity.

>
The concept is therefore called 'stractured spacetime', where 'timelike
stable patterns' are, what we call 'matter'.

>
Matter is charge - electrons orbiting protons or getting stuck to
protons.

>
>
This is 'materialism' (also known as 'particle concept').

Not necessarily. Charges are force generating entities composed from
aether. We are all composed of charges moving through infinitely fine
aether in an infinite universe. Dreamy but explains all.

>
I wanted to prove, that matter is actually not materialistic, but is
build from imaterial 'structures'.

Charge is built from aether, a material solid.

>
As 'proof of concept' I used 'Growing Earth'.
>
This goes like this:
>
if the Earth would grow from within, we can be certain, that the
particle concept must be wrong, because there can't be enough particles
inside of this planet to make it grow from within.

Well a charge can be approximated as a particle for kinetic effects.

>
But if matter is actually 'relative', the Earth could grow, we could use
'spacetime of GR' as replacement for 'aether' and all are happy.

Just throw out all the wrong, stupid, evil, vile, ridiculous, shameless
and unscientific SR and GR shit.

>
>

>
See my 'book' about this idea:
>
https://docs.google.com/presentation/
d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing
>
Relativistic effects are in this concept not related to velocity but to
acceleration.

>
Relativistic effects occur from Earth's movement in space.

>
>
Well, no!
>
'Space' has a different role in my concept.
>
It is is actually based on complex numbers (complex valued four vectors)
and an imaginary axis of time, which multiplied by i gives the three
real valued axes of space.
>
So: the term 'space' is depending on the axis of time, because  a
multiplication by i means (kind of) 90° rotation.
>
Now this has only a relevance, if you would rotate the axis of time a
bit, because in this case a new space would pop out of nowhere, which is
filled with matter never seen before.
>
>

IOW: you could create matter out of nothing, by acceleration of
spacetime.

>
Protons and electrons come from aether and vanish into aether. The most
striking demonstration is growth from life internal forces; cell
splitting into two.

>
This should be observable in some cases as 'Growing Earth' or 'magic
dust'.

>
See any cell split. how matter appears.
We come from aether. We return to aether.

>
Kind of...
>
>
>
TH