Re: Division by zero

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Division by zero
De : mikko.levanto (at) *nospam* iki.fi (Mikko)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 02. Feb 2025, 10:38:32
Autres entêtes
Organisation : -
Message-ID : <vnneeo$ki0v$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Unison/2.2
On 2025-02-02 08:26:00 +0000, Thomas Heger said:

Am Sonntag000002, 02.02.2025 um 07:52 schrieb Thomas Heger:
Am Samstag000001, 01.02.2025 um 10:36 schrieb Mikko:
On 2025-02-01 08:14:08 +0000, Thomas Heger said:
 
Hi NG
 I'm actually not really certain, but found an error in Einstein's 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' which is quite serious.
  See page six, roughly in the middle:
 There we find an equation, which says this:
 ∂τ/∂y= 0
 Do you mean on page 899 (9th page of the article) in §3?
The operation is not division but a partial derivative.
 τ was the name of the time coordinate in k and also the name of a function, which was meant as coordinate transformation between K and k.
 The time coordinate of an event in K has also a value in respect to k, hence time t of K should belong to the parameters of this function τ.
 But y should not, because the velocity along the y-axis was assumed to be zero and the axes of y and eta are assumed to remain parallel.
 So we had a function of time tau, which is 'vertical' upon the value zero of y.
 In my view, such a function would VERY steep, hence ∂τ/∂y= infinity (and not zero!)

For me seemingly ∂y/∂τ= 0 was meant, but ∂τ/∂y= 0 was written.
That "seemingly" is only possible if you don't understand the text
you are attempting to discuss.
The topic at the point is to discuss how τ is determined from x, y, z, and t.
In that context ∂y/∂τ is irrelevat.
You should find out what the symbols in the formulas mean and how the
formulas relate to the surrounding prose before you continue this duscussion.
--
Mikko

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Feb 25 * Division by zero28Thomas Heger
1 Feb 25 +* Re: Division by zero24Mikko
2 Feb 25 i+* Re: Division by zero5Ross Finlayson
2 Feb 25 ii`* Re: Division by zero4Thomas Heger
2 Feb 25 ii +* Re: Division by zero2Mikko
3 Feb 25 ii i`- Re: Division by zero1Paul.B.Andersen
2 Feb 25 ii `- Re: Division by zero (0, 1, infinity)1Ross Finlayson
2 Feb 25 i`* Re: Division by zero18Thomas Heger
2 Feb 25 i +* Re: Division by zero7Thomas Heger
2 Feb 25 i i`* Re: Division by zero6Mikko
3 Feb 25 i i `* Re: Division by zero5Thomas Heger
3 Feb 25 i i  `* Re: Division by zero4Mikko
4 Feb 25 i i   `* Re: Division by zero3Thomas Heger
5 Feb 25 i i    `* Re: Division by zero2Mikko
5 Feb 25 i i     `- Re: Division by zero1Thomas Heger
2 Feb 25 i `* Re: Division by zero10Mikko
3 Feb 25 i  `* Re: Division by zero9Thomas Heger
3 Feb 25 i   +* Re: Division by zero2Athel Cornish-Bowden
3 Feb 25 i   i`- Re: Division by zero1Thomas Heger
3 Feb 25 i   `* Re: Division by zero6Mikko
3 Feb 25 i    +- Re: Division by zero1Maciej Wozniak
4 Feb 25 i    `* Re: Division by zero4Thomas Heger
4 Feb 25 i     `* Re: Division by zero3Mikko
4 Feb 25 i      +- Re: Division by zero1Maciej Wozniak
5 Feb 25 i      `- Re: Division by zero1Thomas Heger
1 Feb 25 +* Re: Division by zero2J. J. Lodder
2 Feb 25 i`- Re: Division by zero1Ross Finlayson
20 Feb 25 `- Re: Division by zero1JanPB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal