Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms

On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:35:17 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
<snip old and new irrelevant shit>

Time τ₁: Ray of light reaches ξ(x')=x', in the moving frame k.
τ₁ = [ξ(x')-ξ(0)]/c = x'/c

>
Sorry, this doesn't work.
>
If the light is moving from the event (ξ₀ = 0, τ₀ = 0) to
the event (ξ₁, τ₁), then we know: τ₁- τ₀ = (ξ₁-ξ₀)/c or τ₁ = ξ₁/c.
>
But we don't know τ₁ or ξ₁, τ₁ = τ(x', Δt₁) and  ξ₁ = ξ(x', Δt₁)
>
We don't know these transforms yet.

We? WE?  OMG, you behave like a possessed actress in The Exorcist movie.
Einstein is the devil that possessed you!
This is EXACTLY what I was affirming on the entire thread, starting with
the title: Einstein KNEW PERFECTLY both Lorentz and Poincaré
transforms!!!
His MAJOR EFFORT is in Point 3, as the rest is PLAGIARISM of Lorentz
(first),
then Poincaré (who had already got rid of Lorentz ether by March 1905).
What he didn't have was THE DERIVATION OF THE GAMMA FACTOR in those
transforms.
The ONLY ONE who mathematically derived the Gamma factor was Voigt in
1987.
The Point 3 is a perfect example of the "petitio principii" FALLACY! HE
KNEW.

You assume that ξ(x', Δt₁) = x' which quite certainly is wrong.
>
You assume that we know the transform we are trying to find.

AGAIN WE?. YOU ARE POSSESSED BY THE DEMON THAT EINSTEIN LEFT HERE ON
EARTH!
The EVENT ξ(x', Δt₁) = x', with arbitrary t=0, OR  ξ(x', x'/(c-v)) = x'
is
a PATHETIC ATTEMPT made by Einstein to FORCE the adoption of the value
obtained in Point 2 (perceived in K) AS IF IT MAY HAPPEN in frame k,
which
is STUPIDLY FALSE.
I've been writing here FOR YEARS that the time lapses t_B-t_A =
r_AB/(c-v) and
t'A-t_A = r_AB/(c-v) + r_AB/(c-v) ARE ESSENTIAL TO OBTAIN THE
DENOMINATOR
(c²-v²), which is the KEY FACTOR TO OBTAIN THE GAMMA FACTOR!
Check the 1904 Lorentz paper if you doubt.
But you are TOO IMBECILE, TOO POSSESSED BY EINSTEIN'S DEMONS to
recognize it.

>
(Now in 2025 know that the transforms  τ(x', Δt₁) and ξ(x', Δt₁)
  are the Lorentz transform, so we know that ξ₁ ≠ x')
>
>

>
Time τ₂: Reflected ray of light reaches ξ(0)=0, in the moving frame k.
τ₂ = τ₁ + [ξ(x')-ξ(0)]/c = τ₁ + x'/c = 2 x'/c

>
Same error.
>
No point in going on.

Your only solution for your MENTAL PROBLEM is to perform an EXORCISM ON
YOU.
But I'm afraid that the possession is so strong that you'll INSTANTLY
DISSOLVE
as the Holly Water touch your body. You'll go KABOOM!
Time run fast. Start gardening, so you'll enjoy some final peace of
mind.
<snip old and irrelevant new shit>