Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms

On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 7:06:53 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

<snip Paul's shit>

The meaning of x' is uncertain, because Einstein wrote no proper
definition.
>
It is therefore not possible to say, to which system x' belongs and what
physical quantity that symbol shall represent.
>
Actually x' should be a coordinate value belonging to system K, because
x is a Latin letter and Latin letters were used for K (Greek letters
were coordinates in k).
>
But what meaning was meant to be encoded into x'  ????
>
I assume, that x' was meant to be the position of a mirror, because x'
should be the place, where a ray of light gets reflected back to its
origin in the center of k.

Please, carefully analyze the attached diagram. I've modified it so x'
is a
FIXED VALUE on the X axis of K.

By doing so, the mirror still remains at x', BUT the thought experiment
LAST ONLY the time t=x/v. After that time, the origin ζ=0 HAS PASS x',
which is increasingly moving to the left of the origin ζ=0.

So, the thought experiment is SHORT LIVED (x/v seconds), because
x'=x-vt.

Einstein did this TO FORCEFULLY MIX variables from k and K, even when
it's temporal. He mixed:

1) The departure of the ray of light from ζ=0, in the MOVING frame K.

2) Placing the mirror on x', he MIXED COORDINATES OF k AND K. HE WANTED
THIS.

3) Timing the arrival of the reflection at time τ₂ to ζ=0 has a WINDOW
OF OPPORTUNITY OF x/v seconds. After that time x/v, the origin ζ=0 is
moving at
the right of x' (which is fixed in K), at the speed v. So, the thought
experiment is EXTREMELY ILL CONCEIVED, and also the assertion


1/2 (τ₀ + τ₂) = τ₁

is FALSE. It's valid only within the moving frame k, because the impact
of v speed is NULL.

Assuming τ₀=0, and only for the interval x/c, τ₁ = x'/c IN THE MOVING
FRAME k.
Also, τ₂ = τ₁ + x'/c = 2 x'/c. This VERIFY 1/2 (τ₀ + τ₂) = τ₁ in frame
k.


BUT, and this is CRUCIAL to keep going, the timing registered in frame K
is:

τ₁ = x´/(c–v), assuming τ₀=0.

τ₂ = τ₁ + x´/(c+v) = x´/(c–v) + x´/(c+v) = 2c x'/(c²–v²)

The above MEANS THAT THE EQUATION 1/2(τ₀+τ₂)=τ₁  IS NOT VERIFIED when
using
values of time registered from the stationary frame K.

This FALSE STATEMENT, alone, is enough to throw out the rest of Point 3.


Furthermore, the ILL DERIVED EQUATION (HACKING TAYLOR RESULTS)

∂τ/∂x' + v/(c² - v²) ∂τ/∂t = 0

is given the solution

τ = a (t-v/(c²-v²) x'

WHICH IS CORRECT, BUT WITH FALSE PREVIOUS DERIVATIONS. Einstein
continues from
this point to deliver


QUOTE:

"For a ray of light emitted at the time τ=0 in the direction of the
increasing ζ

ζ = cτ = a (t-v/(c²-v²) x'

But the ray moves relatively to the initial point of k, when measured in
the
stationary system, with the velocity c − v, so that

x´/(c–v) = t
"
END QUOTE


Now, with mathematical and physical CRIMES committed, he could follow up
further developments to obtain Lorentz.



Never forget that Einstein was a master of fallacies and deceptive
proposals, mixed with TRUNCATED ASSERTIONS, which served him to
hide/disguise THE TRUTH.

I always said, for the last 6 years, that Einstein was a fraudster which
was
MATHEMATICALLY INEPT. However, I always recognized his HIGH EMOTIONAL
INTELLIGENCE, which served very well in his short career of 10 years in
physics.

He had extraordinary capabilities to manipulate people, since college.
He was mostly A SALESMAN. He used every used car salesman trick to
obtain what he wanted from people around him. This includes his move
with acknowledges, crying for help and victimizing him. This is
DOCUMENTED in the big database of Einstein's letters, that Princeton put
online decades ago. I READ THEM ALL.


In this particular 1905 paper, a detailed analysis of the M.O. of WHO'S
BEHIND the writings serves as a particular exercise to derive traits of
personality. I like doing that, and I used such technique extensively
with many scientists. It's incredible how much information can you
gather when you analyze writings, even when they are mathematically
based. There is a science of profiling behind it.


CONCLUSION: Either if x' is a point in the k frame or in the K frame,
the result is INVARIANT. He cheated/hacked/misguided all what he needed
TO FORCE RELATIONSHIPS between variables in both frames. Target: to
obtain Lorentz transforms on his own way. I repeat: only Woldemar Voigt,
in 1887, derived a mathematical expression for the Gamma factor, local
time and transforms. Other people (like Lorentz and even Poincaré) used
them without further explanations.


Relativity is a DECEPTIVE PSEUDOSCIENCE, based on PERCEPTIONS and tricky
mathematics. Not a single derivation of it has accountability for the
author. This is because relativity is a convenient tool to expand
physics beyond the original 1905 objectives. Minkowski's formalism of
spacetime only made this pseudoscience much worse, backed by
mathematics, NOT PHYSICS.

But if x' is a fixed position on the x-axis of K, the subsequent
statements wouldn't make sense.
>
Also the equation  x' = x - vt would be wrong, because in the context of
the Galilean transform x' has a certain other meaning, for which
Einstein had to use the symbol ξ ('xsi'), because that was his naming
convention.
>
Now it gets tricky, because it is actually impossible to assign the used
symbols consistently to one of the two coordinate systems.
>
It is, of course(!!!), important in relativity, that the relation of any
variable to the meant system is always clear without any doubt, but that
wasn't the case in Einstein's text.
>
Better would have been to use an index (and not Greek letters) to make
clear, to which system a certain variable belongs.
>
Also the state of motion (e.g. at rest vs. in motion) needs a sign,
which is used consistently (like e.g.  another index or the prime ').
>
But that was also not the case.
>
Therefore we cannot say with certainty, how the used symbols were meant
and to which system a variable shall belong.
>
Now we can guess as long as we like and cannot identify, who Einstein
actually meant his equations.
>
But ambiguity is an error in a scientific paper and a serious one!
>
>
TH