Re: Relativity Derives Zero Deflection of Light By Gravity.

On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 2:03:24 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:

Le 20/02/2025 à 23:39, clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) a écrit
:

>
This is just an elementary school formula which you never progressed
past.
You are like an adult that forever is stuck practising scales while
claiming Bach and Beethoven never existed.
>
--
Jan
>
--

Everyone can see you cannot explain how anything can have momentum
without mass. Resort to ad hominem is a failure to reason.

>
Ad hominem attacks are unfortunately far too frequent. We don't explain
anything, we attack.
Here, I'm not sure that the attack is even scientifically justified,
because it is wrong to believe that there has been a fantastic evolution
of thought since p=mv.
Certainly the relativists understood that p=mv/sqrt(1-v²/c²) but there
is no need to shout glory to God from the rooftops. They don't even know
why, and most of them believe that it is mass that is relative, and not
the perception of speed.
Don't laugh, friends, I've been reading what scientists and social
networks say for 40 years.
And it's scary.
It's terrifyingly stupid.
>
R.H.

Of course, p=mv/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) still requires mass, and it is mistaken
anyway. The state of physics is like a cloud of unknowing. I see that
fog floating around Jan's head.