Re: Einstein FRAUD with the paper on m=E/c^2

On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 13:35:41 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>
<snip>

It is much correct in what you say.
>
BUT:
The equation
   E = ∝ m
say there is some kind of equivalence between mass and energy,
and that mass can be converted to energy and vice versa.
>
This can only be empirically tested.

>
<snip>
>

E = m
>
But remember, the equivalency is empirically shown to be true.

>
It's a no-brainer to believe in the conversion of mass into energy.
>
>
In the last couple of millenniums, or even longer than that, and even
before the CONSENSUS that heat was a kind of energy (early XIX century),
thousands/millions of inquisitive minds wondered HOW COME wood in a fire
CONSUMED to ashes, with most of its volume disappearing, while heat
(radiant, by convection or conduction) was generated. The first
water-based engine/toy was invented about 2,000 years ago.
>
The heated water disappeared (mass), converting the opposite flows into
mechanical work (energy). Ancient Romans enjoyed this gadget, and I'm
sure that many tried to find a practical use of this effect.
>
https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/oqn2f/til_the_ancient_romans_had_steam_engines_the/
>
>
What I've been questioned here, for years, is that E=mc^2 is A FUCKING
CONVENTION, and that Einstein committed FRAUD in his FUCKING 1905 paper,
using circular reasoning. After a few years, seal physicists applauded
this simple equation (NOT PROVEN ONCE THEORETICALLY), and hyped the
image of Einstein as the genius of geniuses.
>
>
Relativity is MORE A CULT than anything else. It's a pseudoscience that
the Jewish community has been shoving down the throat of gullible, yet
intelligent people.
>
A fucking CULT, promoted by Jewish media and publishing houses. There
were better and much more intelligent people than the fucking
plagiarist. YET,....
>
1946:
https://content.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,19460701,00.html
>
1999:
https://content.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,19991231,00.html
>
E=mc^2, A CONVENTION ADOPTED FOR EASINESS IN SCIENCE, YET UNPROVEN
THEORETICALLY SO FAR.
>
Same shit with KE = 1/2 m v^2  (why 1/2 is present?)
>
Do you want true science examples?
>
- Kepler laws, derived from empirical evidence.
- Newton laws, derived from Kepler laws, Galileo's work and many others.
- Maxwell laws, derived from empirical data + proven insights for
decades,
  collected by Faraday, Gauss and HUNDRED of experimentalists.
- Alpha and Beta radiation (Rutherford) plus the insight of atomic
structure
  PLUS heavy experimentation.
- Quantum of action h (Planck), derived by fitting theoretically data
collected
  for almost a decade (XIX century) from the PTB labs AND Wien's
theories.
>
>
Pseudoscience examples?
>
- Relativity, derived by A FUCKING CLERK with no prior antecedents of
being
  a genius, but plenty of evidence of being a charlatan, a fraudster, an
  impostor with no moral nor scruples. A beggar, who cheated and
backstabbed
  everyone who him HYPNOTIZED to get their help. A master plagiarist.