Re: Einstein FRAUD with the paper on m=E/c^2

rhertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 8:38:47 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
 

Den 05.03.2025 19:11, skrev rhertz:

>
I question your assertion that E = mc? work both ways (mc? = E). This IS
NOT AN EQUATION! This is a 1-way expression, which doesn't work
reversing terms positions.

>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pair_production
>
? ? e? + e?

 
I asked you not to come with the particle physics shit.

Too difficult for you?

Tell me about MATTER created by energy anywhere, in scales above the
mysterious quantum world (of which, BTW, nobody knows shit even after
100 years).

At CERN, among other places.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antihydrogen>
Thousands of anti-atoms, so far, created from (lots of!) energy.
Matter, mind you, stationary, in a trap,
not just charged particles flying by.

Do you have one example of 1 gramm of MATTER created by energy? (The
reverse case of the stupid end in the 1905 Einstein's paper).

You are just being silly here. One gram equals 10^14 Joule,
which is the output of a gigawatt power plant for a whole day.
Given the extremely low conversion efficiencies,
the creation of one gram of anti-hydrogen would use up more energy
than all of humanity taken together can generate.

Jan