Re: Einstein FRAUD with the paper on m=E/c^2

Den 08.03.2025 22:57, skrev rhertz:

 I wasn't expecting less from you, Paul. A sad example of how dementia
has
eroded most of the little brain that nature gave you at birth.

And which statement of mine have you proven wrong with this
lethal argument?

 By 1900, and for retarded assholes like you and Einstein, inertia and
mass WERE EQUIVALENT!

Indeed.
But Einstein, you and I know that what is conveyed with EM radiation
is not mass, but energy and momentum.
So when Einstein said:
"radiation conveys inertia between the emitting and absorbing bodies"
his point is that energy has inertia.
So even if the emitting body is conveying energy and no mass to
the absorbing body, the mass of the emitting body will become less
while the mass of the absorbing body will increase.
Now we know that Einstein was right, E = mc² works both ways.
Pion decay:       m → γ + γ   energy, momentum and inertia conserved
Pair production:  γ → e⁻ + e⁺ energy, momentum and inertia conserved
Remember?

 And that came from Newton First Law, 200 years in the past of Einstein's
time.

Right.
But Newton was wrong when he believed that mass always is conserved.

 Real experimental and theoretical physicists (not the clerk case) were
using the more descriptive term mass instead of inertia, but THE
IMBECILE THAT YOU ADORE
had to name his micro-paper as: DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON
ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
 See, asshole? He used INERTIA instead of MASS, just to use FANCY WORDING
in his fucking NANO-paper.
 But he had to concede that he was talking about MASS all the time, when
he rescued (L/c^2) as the MASS in the Kinetic Energy LOOK-ALIKE
TRUNCATED EXPANSION OF GAMMA FACTOR USING McLAURIN.
  But now you feel ENTITLED to figure out what the CRETIN meant when he
wrote his pico-paper?
 The problem with people like you, gullible asshole who devoted a life
defending your pagan god and relativity is that you are THE PERFECT
TARGET OF THE KING OF CHARLATANS. And you're willing to give your life
for such a scoundrel.
  I don't even feel sorry for you. You deserve what happened with you and
will pay for your sins in the FUCKING HELL, relativist.

But I feel sorry for you, who think you can falsify SR and GR  by use of ad hominem and profanities.
You seem to have a very troubled mind.
--
Paul
https://paulba.no/