Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.

On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 21:42:44 +0000, gharnagel wrote:
<snip>

I only support what I have determined the way the world actually works.
I do this by studying EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE and adjusting my belief
system to agree with that, rather then having a frozen belief system
like certain people in this "discussion" group.

YOUR "EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE" IS JUST BULLSHIT (Warning: mild profanity
here).
Your belief is trapped in circular and fallacious logic. Here is why:
- The "evidence" is the result of theoretical calculations, not
measurements.
- Suppose that the time of the onboard Cs clock is measured by
accumulating
  counts of cycles of the 10.23 Mhz master TCXO clock. This, to
accumulate
  pulses with a period of 97.7517 nsec during 86,400 sec, requires an
onboard
  digital counter displaying 883,872,000,000 counts (12 digits). Such
data,
  at the end of the 24 hours period MUST be sent down to Earth station,
where
  a twin Cs clock is also counting pulses in sync with the onboard Cs
clock.
  Will a comparison differ in 389 LOST PULSES (38 usec)?
  I don't think so and even less that such ONLY SOLUTION to the problem
had
  even implemented to prove the fucking (WARNING: severe profanity)
relativity
  in 1977. If you think so, you are an imbecile beyond redemption.
- The calculation of the 38 usec/day REQUIRES A THEORETICAL SEPARATION
of GR
  and SR effects using Schwarzschild. It's the same crap that in the
Hafele-
  Keating 1972 experiment, where data for SR and GR were calculated
  theoretically.
- The ALLEGED EFFECT of the 7 us/day due to SR are MISCALCULATED using
  Schwarzschild, because this alleged effect MANIFEST in rectilinear
  trajectories, NOT IN NON-INERTIAL TRAJECTORIES OF AN ELLIPTIC ORBIT!!!
I left this here because I'm tired of throwing FACTS on the table. You
will rationalize and negate what I wrote.
This is enough for me. Relativity IS A FARCE, A PSEUDOSCIENCE, A CULT.

"Try being informed instead of just opinionated." -- Anon.
>

Also support the widely published daily delay of (45-7) usec that
comes from Schwarzschild applied to GPS. You HAVE TO, BECAUSE YOUR
CULT OBLIGES YOU AND CRITICIZING THE SHIT IS PUNISHED WITH "MORTE
CIVILE" IN YOUR PAGAN CHURCH.

>
I support it because it has been measured:
>
"At the time of launch of the first NTS-2 satellite (June 1977), which
contained the first Cesium clock to be placed in orbit, there were some
who doubted that relativistic effects were real. [Like certain reality-
deniers who frequent this group]  A frequency synthesizer was built
into the satellite clock system so that after launch, if in fact the
rate of the clock in its final orbit was that predicted by GR, then the
synthesizer could be turned on bringing the clock to the coordinate
rate necessary for operation. The atomic clock was first operated for
about 20 days to measure its clock rate before turning on the synthe-
sizer. The frequency measured during that interval was +442.5 parts
in 10^12 faster than clocks on the ground; if left uncorrected this
would have resulted in timing errors of about 38,000 nanoseconds per
day." -- Neil Ashby
http://www.leapsecond.com/history/Ashby-Relativity.htm
>

Not even one fucking single time the change in frequency has been
measured,

>
Denial of reality is a mental disorder.

<snip>