Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.

I asked to DeepSeek to analyze this comment that you did:
 QUESTION;
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm discussing this matter with a relativist, in a physics forum. Can
you tell me what you think of this comment of him?: COMMENT: "ROFL
 Definitely one of you better misconception!
 Do you really, seriously believe that 'relativists' claim that
the receiver can measure the frequency of the L1 carrier to be
1575.42 MHz = 154*10.23 MHz and can use this to recover the
master TCXO frequency of 10.23000000 Mhz? :-D
 You claim to be an engineer and must understand that it is
no way a GPS receiver can measure the L1 frequency with any precision
better than ~ 1575420000 ±150 Hz.
 But you believe that 'relativists' claim they can measure the frequency
of L1 to be 1575420000 ±0.025 Hz!
  DEEPSEEK ANSWER:
----------------------------------------------------------
5. Conclusion
The commenter is correct that directly measuring the L1 frequency with a
precision of ±0.025 Hz is unrealistic for a GPS receiver.