Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.

One problem with modern physics, since WWII, is that the population of
physicists increased 50 times since then, and the LACK OF TALENT TO BE A
POLYMATH is huge.
As complexity of any field in physics increase, mainly due to the
accumulated amount of information that they have to manage, and the
compartmentalizing of physics has vastly increased, any physicist that
want to leave a mark in this science has to choose just one field and
devote to it most of its professional life in order to add a new layer
of ideas (if he's lucky enough).
In the case of neutrino specialists, they have to struggle to cope the
increase of information from the last 3 or 4 decades if they want to add
something else to the pile of crap that knowledge in physics is.
Imagine a young physicist thinking WHERE TO DIG in his field of choice,
in order to write a paper with something new. In the case of neutrinos,
the knowledge went from a crazy idea to preserve the law of conservation
of energy (Pauli, 100 years ago) to the even more crazy and complex idea
that neutrinos had a crucial role in the evolution of the universe since
the big bang. Add to it the new ideas about HOW ANY STAR generates
energy from elementary Hydrogen.
So, as time advances, more physicists are forced to be more selective
(forget polymaths, as was usual 100+ years ago), and THEN PLAY BY THE
BOOK (don't dare to contradict any relativity crap).