Re: Muon paradox

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Muon paradox
De : clzb93ynxj (at) *nospam* att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 31. Mar 2025, 22:09:44
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <bdd9f308f0146fca1e34f1c45c9ef14e@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
"Special Relativity fails to resolve cosmic muon decay"
Rasjid Chan Kah Chew
"There is actually no need to invoke Special Relativity to resolve any
“paradox” as there is none. The true average lifetime as measured in the
CERN laboratory for a speed of 0.9994 c is 64.368(29)µs; so the muon
could cover a distance of 19000 meter and not just 600 meter.
From J. Bailey et al [3]:
“The lifetime of both relativistic (γ = 29:33) positive and negative
muons have been measured in the CERN muon storage ring with the result :
τ+ = 64:419(58)µs, τ- = 64:368(29)µs. Assuming special relativity, the
mean proper lifetime for µ- is found (my comment: meaning computed) to
be : τ0- = 2:19489(10)µs.””

Date Sujet#  Auteur
31 Mar 25 * Muon paradox88LaurenceClarkCrossen
31 Mar 25 +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
31 Mar 25 +* Re: Muon paradox21LaurenceClarkCrossen
31 Mar 25 i`* Re: Muon paradox20LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i `* Re: Muon paradox19Richard Hachel
1 Apr 25 i  +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i  +* Re: Muon paradox3LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr18:49 i  i`* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr19:01 i  i `- Re: Muon paradox1Ross Finlayson
1 Apr 25 i  `* Re: Muon paradox14guido wugi
1 Apr 25 i   +* Re: Muon paradox2Richard Hachel
1 Apr18:38 i   i`- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr16:24 i   +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr16:31 i   +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr16:38 i   `* Re: Muon paradox9LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr19:26 i    `* Re: Muon paradox8Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr19:41 i     +* Re: Muon paradox3Ross Finlayson
1 Apr20:24 i     i`* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr23:56 i     i `- Re: Muon paradox1Ross Finlayson
1 Apr20:12 i     `* Re: Muon paradox4LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr08:45 i      `* Re: Muon paradox3Paul.B.Andersen
2 Apr10:13 i       +- Re: Muon paradox1Rubin Yablokov
2 Apr17:45 i       `- Re: Muon paradox1Ross Finlayson
1 Apr18:42 +* Re: Muon paradox10LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr19:38 i`* Re: Muon paradox9Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr20:15 i +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr22:24 i `* Re: Muon paradox7LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr10:45 i  `* Re: Muon paradox6Paul.B.Andersen
2 Apr12:33 i   +- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
2 Apr18:46 i   `* Re: Muon paradox4LaurenceClarkCrossen
3 Apr09:18 i    `* Re: Muon paradox3Paul.B.Andersen
3 Apr09:39 i     +- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr21:51 i     `- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr18:56 +* Re: Muon paradox52Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr19:17 i+- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
1 Apr19:44 i+* Re: Muon paradox6Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr19:54 ii+* Re: Muon paradox2Maciej Wozniak
1 Apr22:26 iii`- Re: Muon paradox1Edilberto Gayazov
1 Apr20:19 ii+- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr22:42 ii`* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr09:21 ii `- Re: Muon paradox1Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr20:06 i+* Re: Muon paradox43LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr11:00 ii`* Re: Muon paradox42Paul.B.Andersen
2 Apr18:58 ii +* Re: Muon paradox15LaurenceClarkCrossen
3 Apr09:18 ii i`* Re: Muon paradox14Paul.B.Andersen
3 Apr09:40 ii i +* Re: Muon paradox12Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr19:50 ii i i`* Re: Muon paradox11Darling Vassilopulos
3 Apr20:51 ii i i `* Re: Muon paradox10Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr23:03 ii i i  `* Re: Muon paradox9Richard Hachel
3 Apr23:58 ii i i   +* Re: Muon paradox3LaurenceClarkCrossen
4 Apr12:49 ii i i   i`* Re: Muon paradox2Richard Hachel
5 Apr08:37 ii i i   i `- Re: Muon paradox1Thomas Heger
4 Apr06:48 ii i i   +* Re: Muon paradox3Thomas Heger
4 Apr13:02 ii i i   i+- Re: Muon paradox1Richard Hachel
5 Apr08:31 ii i i   i`- Re: Muon paradox1Thomas Heger
4 Apr13:13 ii i i   `* Re: Muon paradox2Richard Hachel
4 Apr13:41 ii i i    `- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr21:54 ii i `- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr20:32 ii +* Re: Muon paradox2Aether Regained
2 Apr22:33 ii i`- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr22:33 ii `* Re: Muon paradox24LaurenceClarkCrossen
3 Apr09:39 ii  `* Re: Muon paradox23Paul.B.Andersen
3 Apr09:43 ii   +- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr21:56 ii   +* Re: Muon paradox20LaurenceClarkCrossen
4 Apr13:55 ii   i`* Re: Muon paradox19Paul.B.Andersen
4 Apr14:49 ii   i +* Re: Muon paradox3Maciej Wozniak
4 Apr23:11 ii   i i`* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr15:57 ii   i i `- Re: Muon paradox1Richard Hachel
4 Apr22:15 ii   i +* Re: Muon paradox5LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr10:32 ii   i i`* Re: Muon paradox4Paul.B.Andersen
5 Apr13:00 ii   i i +- Re: Muon paradox1Richard Hachel
5 Apr21:53 ii   i i +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
6 Apr06:03 ii   i i `- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
5 Apr19:57 ii   i `* Re: Muon paradox10Paul.B.Andersen
5 Apr20:01 ii   i  +* Re: Muon paradox6Paul.B.Andersen
5 Apr20:14 ii   i  i+- Re: Muon paradox1Ross Finlayson
5 Apr22:03 ii   i  i+- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr22:55 ii   i  i+- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr23:15 ii   i  i+- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr23:46 ii   i  i`- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr22:01 ii   i  `* Re: Muon paradox3LaurenceClarkCrossen
6 Apr14:15 ii   i   `* Re: Muon paradox2Paul.B.Andersen
6 Apr14:51 ii   i    `- Re: Muon paradox1Richard Hachel
3 Apr22:37 ii   `- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr23:02 i`- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr22:08 `* Re: Muon paradox3Kent Bazhukov
1 Apr22:21  `* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr23:01   `- Re: Muon paradox1Lane Babenkov

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal