Re: Muon paradox

On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 1:02:00 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:

Le 31/03/2025 à 23:54, clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) a écrit
:

Relativity can be so easy to refute only because it has not been subject
to open critical review. It is facile nonsense.

>
It's true.
>
Scientific structures, like political structures, are strange and
opaque.
>
If someone tries to offer an interesting approach, or prove through
calculations and reflection that there are biases and paradoxes, or even
contradictions, they are blacklisted for decades.
>
I think we'll have to wait until artificial intelligence is truly
intelligent, and above all memorizing, for it to be able to say things
for
itself: "I detected in a participant a theory that far surpasses in
quality, elegance, and experimental approach anything that has been said
so far."
>
For the moment, this hasn't happened because there is a huge human bias
that consists of saying: "It is impossible for there to exist a human on
earth capable of producing a theory superior to the one proposed by Mr.
Einstein."
>
Even if sometimes the denials turn into absurdity, even human madness.
>
R.H.

The scientific consensus often involves the need to market their product
at the expense of the truth. The AI's are true believers. Albert in
reativityland does a good job of covering sociological and political
influences on the acceptance of relativity.