Re: Muon paradox

On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 5:03:57 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

W dniu 01.04.2025 o 06:01, LaurenceClarkCrossen pisze:

On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 1:02:00 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:
>

Le 31/03/2025 à 23:54, clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) a écrit
:

Relativity can be so easy to refute only because it has not been subject
to open critical review. It is facile nonsense.

>
It's true.
>
Scientific structures, like political structures, are strange and
opaque.
>
If someone tries to offer an interesting approach, or prove through
calculations and reflection that there are biases and paradoxes, or even
contradictions, they are blacklisted for decades.
>
I think we'll have to wait until artificial intelligence is truly
intelligent, and above all memorizing, for it to be able to say things
for
itself: "I detected in a participant a theory that far surpasses in
quality, elegance, and experimental approach anything that has been said
so far."
>
For the moment, this hasn't happened because there is a huge human bias
that consists of saying: "It is impossible for there to exist a human on
earth capable of producing a theory superior to the one proposed by Mr.
Einstein."
>
Even if sometimes the denials turn into absurdity, even human madness.
>
R.H.

How can the muons prove time dilation when high speed is the cause and
they move the same speed as in the laboratory?

>
 From the point of view of muons...
If the muons have mouths - they would scream
that our Giant Guru was right and sing
a hymn to his incredible wisdom!!!
They would, for sure!!
And muons can never be mistaken. Have
you ever heard of a mistaken muon?
>
That's the proof.

The difficulty we are confronted with is due to the fact that Einstein
did not realize that Newton's particle theory had been disproven and the
wave theory had been proven.