Re: Muon paradox

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Muon paradox
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 01. Apr 2025, 19:41:39
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <wPGdnZ2Gj7r7rnH6nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
On 04/01/2025 11:26 AM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 01.04.2025 17:38, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>
I mean, "Yes, muons have mass, and their mass is approximately 207 times
that of an electron, with a value of about 105.7 MeV/c², according to
Britannica [10, 17] and other sources [1, 3, 6, 7]." -Google AI
So they must move faster in the atmosphere.
>
So since the mass of a  muon is 207 times the mass of an electron
it must fall 207 times faster than an electron? :-D
>
The inverse of frequency and wavelength with regards to waves or
the particles moving along as those are and calling that all
"electromagnetic radiation" is one of the great conflations
since the kinetic and nuclear and electromagnetic radiation
in both the long and short waves and the special optical light
and the three constants "c" about the light's and the electromagnetic
and electrostatics', and about waves whether it's velocity,
help illustrate that according to that kind of conflation,
muons don't so much belong to SR, nor make much sense from
the conflated and ignorant SR-ianism.
Not so much that's their fault, as, doesn't belong to them.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
31 Mar 25 * Muon paradox88LaurenceClarkCrossen
31 Mar 25 +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
31 Mar 25 +* Re: Muon paradox21LaurenceClarkCrossen
31 Mar 25 i`* Re: Muon paradox20LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i `* Re: Muon paradox19Richard Hachel
1 Apr 25 i  +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i  +* Re: Muon paradox3LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr18:49 i  i`* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr19:01 i  i `- Re: Muon paradox1Ross Finlayson
1 Apr 25 i  `* Re: Muon paradox14guido wugi
1 Apr 25 i   +* Re: Muon paradox2Richard Hachel
1 Apr18:38 i   i`- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr16:24 i   +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr16:31 i   +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr16:38 i   `* Re: Muon paradox9LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr19:26 i    `* Re: Muon paradox8Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr19:41 i     +* Re: Muon paradox3Ross Finlayson
1 Apr20:24 i     i`* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr23:56 i     i `- Re: Muon paradox1Ross Finlayson
1 Apr20:12 i     `* Re: Muon paradox4LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr08:45 i      `* Re: Muon paradox3Paul.B.Andersen
2 Apr10:13 i       +- Re: Muon paradox1Rubin Yablokov
2 Apr17:45 i       `- Re: Muon paradox1Ross Finlayson
1 Apr18:42 +* Re: Muon paradox10LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr19:38 i`* Re: Muon paradox9Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr20:15 i +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr22:24 i `* Re: Muon paradox7LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr10:45 i  `* Re: Muon paradox6Paul.B.Andersen
2 Apr12:33 i   +- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
2 Apr18:46 i   `* Re: Muon paradox4LaurenceClarkCrossen
3 Apr09:18 i    `* Re: Muon paradox3Paul.B.Andersen
3 Apr09:39 i     +- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr21:51 i     `- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr18:56 +* Re: Muon paradox52Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr19:17 i+- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
1 Apr19:44 i+* Re: Muon paradox6Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr19:54 ii+* Re: Muon paradox2Maciej Wozniak
1 Apr22:26 iii`- Re: Muon paradox1Edilberto Gayazov
1 Apr20:19 ii+- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr22:42 ii`* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr09:21 ii `- Re: Muon paradox1Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr20:06 i+* Re: Muon paradox43LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr11:00 ii`* Re: Muon paradox42Paul.B.Andersen
2 Apr18:58 ii +* Re: Muon paradox15LaurenceClarkCrossen
3 Apr09:18 ii i`* Re: Muon paradox14Paul.B.Andersen
3 Apr09:40 ii i +* Re: Muon paradox12Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr19:50 ii i i`* Re: Muon paradox11Darling Vassilopulos
3 Apr20:51 ii i i `* Re: Muon paradox10Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr23:03 ii i i  `* Re: Muon paradox9Richard Hachel
3 Apr23:58 ii i i   +* Re: Muon paradox3LaurenceClarkCrossen
4 Apr12:49 ii i i   i`* Re: Muon paradox2Richard Hachel
5 Apr08:37 ii i i   i `- Re: Muon paradox1Thomas Heger
4 Apr06:48 ii i i   +* Re: Muon paradox3Thomas Heger
4 Apr13:02 ii i i   i+- Re: Muon paradox1Richard Hachel
5 Apr08:31 ii i i   i`- Re: Muon paradox1Thomas Heger
4 Apr13:13 ii i i   `* Re: Muon paradox2Richard Hachel
4 Apr13:41 ii i i    `- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr21:54 ii i `- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr20:32 ii +* Re: Muon paradox2Aether Regained
2 Apr22:33 ii i`- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr22:33 ii `* Re: Muon paradox24LaurenceClarkCrossen
3 Apr09:39 ii  `* Re: Muon paradox23Paul.B.Andersen
3 Apr09:43 ii   +- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr21:56 ii   +* Re: Muon paradox20LaurenceClarkCrossen
4 Apr13:55 ii   i`* Re: Muon paradox19Paul.B.Andersen
4 Apr14:49 ii   i +* Re: Muon paradox3Maciej Wozniak
4 Apr23:11 ii   i i`* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr15:57 ii   i i `- Re: Muon paradox1Richard Hachel
4 Apr22:15 ii   i +* Re: Muon paradox5LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr10:32 ii   i i`* Re: Muon paradox4Paul.B.Andersen
5 Apr13:00 ii   i i +- Re: Muon paradox1Richard Hachel
5 Apr21:53 ii   i i +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
6 Apr06:03 ii   i i `- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
5 Apr19:57 ii   i `* Re: Muon paradox10Paul.B.Andersen
5 Apr20:01 ii   i  +* Re: Muon paradox6Paul.B.Andersen
5 Apr20:14 ii   i  i+- Re: Muon paradox1Ross Finlayson
5 Apr22:03 ii   i  i+- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr22:55 ii   i  i+- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr23:15 ii   i  i+- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr23:46 ii   i  i`- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr22:01 ii   i  `* Re: Muon paradox3LaurenceClarkCrossen
6 Apr14:15 ii   i   `* Re: Muon paradox2Paul.B.Andersen
6 Apr14:51 ii   i    `- Re: Muon paradox1Richard Hachel
3 Apr22:37 ii   `- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr23:02 i`- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr22:08 `* Re: Muon paradox3Kent Bazhukov
1 Apr22:21  `* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr23:01   `- Re: Muon paradox1Lane Babenkov

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal