Re: Albert in Relativityland

On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 18:54:42 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

Den 31.03.2025 22:44, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:

Here is a good review of some critiques of relativity.
>
"A critical introduction to “Einstein‟s theory of relativity”
>
"written by a non-scientist for other non-scientists who have some
intellectual curiosity about this famous theory, with pictures in it and
140 references and citations to authority. 30 pages."
by Raleigh Amesbury

>
Written for non scientist who understand nothing of any theory
of physics, and thus believe they are qualified to make
the following sharp analysis of SR and GR.
>
Laurence, it is written for you!
>

>
"“Einstein‟s theory of relativity” is substantially science fiction,
fantasy or philosophy, and represents the worst of science: how science
can become political, how political factors can affect funding, how
funding can affect scientists‟ jobs and careers, how experimental data
can be manipulated to serve as propaganda, and how theory can be
presented as fact.
Scientific theories come and go. It is about time “Einstein‟s theory of
relativity” went.
.. The day will come when nobody even mentions either of them anymore.
Physicists need only scrap the erroneous hypotheses of length
contraction, time dilation, mass distortion, the c speed limit,
space-time and curved space, and science will be reasonable and back on
track again."

>

Relativity is so fallacious that a person with only knowledge of
elementary logic and an 85 I.Q. is qualified to refute it. It is only
prestigious due to PR. You are making an ad hominem attack because you
are failing to reason. You have continued to fail to give the cause of
the time dilation in the absence of different speeds.