Sujet : Re: How? ? ?
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* tiscali.fr (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 02. Apr 2025, 18:16:42
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <0zELNrYrShlgCWuaPp51XhnoTUI@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Nemo/1.0
Le 02/04/2025 à 18:20, Elpidio Babadjan a écrit :
Python wrote:
In reality this quite the opposite as you are the one getting mad at the
idea that x^n + 1 has n roots in C.
ohh really, -1^3 = -1, this guy must be french. What a disgrace.
It's nothing ; it's Python, a Breton independence activist who doesn't wish much good for those who are French.
As for the rest, he's talking nonsense, and still hasn't understood not only Dr. Richard Hachel's positions on relativistic kinematics, but also (even though he claims to be a mathematician) why I don't consider imaginary structure comparable to real structure, as well as the operations that go with it.
I told Mr. Python (Baccalaureate +1 level) that he should propose a mathematical structure such that:
1) For all x, i^x=-1.
2) For all even x, (-i)^x=-1
3) For all odd x, (-i)^x=1
This is a somewhat revolutionary thought from an imbecile mind (Baccalaureate +8, nonetheless), which Mr. Python (Baccalaureate +1) cannot comprehend.
When he's done being a clown, maybe we'll have some nice days.
R.H.