Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.

On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 19:57:00 +0000, Aether Regained wrote:

rhertz:> In 1930 Wolfgang Pauli  proposed the existence of the neutrino
(named in

1933 by Fermi) to solve the violation of energy conservation in beta
decay (when a neutron turns into a proton and emits an electron).
Scientists observed that the emitted electrons had varying energies,
rather than a fixed value as expected. The neutrino was ALLEGEDLY
detected experimentally by Cowan and Reines in 1956.
>
The missing energy varied from 0.1 to 0.2 eV (millions of times lower
than electrons at rest). Pauli assumed that neutrinos might be massless,
like photons, and this kept in the '70s, with the Standard Model
(1970s). Analysis from Solar Neutrinos (1960s–2001) suggested that
neutrinos oscillate, wich (de Broglie) require mass.
>
Up to date, the neutinos mass is UNKNOWN. As neutrinos proved to be the
JOKER CARD of particle physics, different types of neutrino emerged
since its invention TO JUSTIFY the conservation of energy. All three of
them were asigned a spin of 1/2 in the Standard Model, only for
equations involving SMEP charged particles. They are; Electron neutrino
(< 2.2 eV), Muon neutrino (< 0.17 eV) and Tau neutrino (< 15.5 MeV). The
energies ARE STILL NOT KNOWN (so their mass, IF THEY HAVE IT AT ALL).
>

>
In psychology there is a well documented phenomenon, in which a
perpetrator accuses others of the very sin he is guilty of.
>
Pauli is the classic example of this. He was the one who coined the
term: "NOT EVEN WRONG" to describe a theory that could not be falsified.
In hindsight we see that it was his coping mechanism or a preemptive
measure he took, so others didn't accuse him of being "NOT EVEN WRONG"
with his unfalsifiable neutrino theory.

That is how ideologies are defended as in politics. Peter Hayes has
shown that relativity functions as an ideology in his paper: "The
Ideology of Relativity: The Case of the Clock Paradox"