Re: Muon paradox

On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 8:18:44 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

Den 02.04.2025 19:58, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:

On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 10:00:04 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>

Den 01.04.2025 21:06, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:

It's easy to understand that the lifetime of the muons is longer and
that time dilation is an illogical fiction divorced from physics.

>

>
The measured mean lifetime of a stationary muon is 2.2 μs
The measured mean lifetime of a muon moving at 0.999668⋅c is 85.36 μs.
>
These are measured facts!
>
You claim this is easy to understand without using SR,
so please explain why muons live longer when they are moving.

>

Interpretations are not facts. Time dilation is an interpretation. An
illogical and pseudo-scientific

>
You can't interpret facts to be not facts,
but you can interpret facts.
>
The measured facts are:
The measured mean lifetime of a stationary muon is 2.2 μs
The measured mean lifetime of a muon moving at 0.999668⋅c is 85.36 μs.
>
THESE ARE FACTS, not interpretations of FACTS!
>
I am asking YOU to interpret these FACTS.
>
The SR interpretation is that it is "time dilation".
>
You claim that it is easy to explain these FACTS without
using an illogical fiction divorced from physics.
>
What is your logical explanation ?
>
If you flee the question yet again, I will ask you yet again.

I already answered the question. They live longer. They don't time
dilate.
You have not answered the question: What is the cause according to
relativity?