Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.
De : hitlong (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 04. Apr 2025, 04:48:09
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <8355d826b69dc00985239a0a3463154e@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 22:05:15 +0000, rhertz wrote:
>
- Angular momentum IS NOT CONSERVED on Earth. MAYBE, AND LOCALLY, in
outer space and up to Mars. After Mars, many things are unknown yet.
As an example, using an ice dancer, angular momentum changes when
rotating with arms extended or close to the body. Now compute losses due
to friction, air dragging and additional unknown quantum phenomena. NOT
CONSERVED.
>
- Linear momentum. Almost the same apply.
>
- Energy: Are planets REALLY verifying the LCE? They started to exist
from NOTHING and, millennia after millennia, some energy IS LOST! Why
does this happen and where the lost energy is going? Apply the same to
galaxies, local universe, etc.
Hertz makes assertions without evidence.  He has not "computed" the
losses nor even the energy or angular momentum.  It's a bit late to
measure planet formation, but we do have some information of meteor
impact.  No one, however, was there to make careful measurement on
the temperature to determine how much energy was lost due to friction,
spallation, radiation, etc.  We know a lot about radiation and its
behavior with temperature, which is where an appreciable amount of
what is lost.  Planets grew by catastrophic collisions, and even
giant meteors create nuclear bomb temperatures.  Hertz hasn't even
calculated a pittance of what would be required to justify his rantings.

There are HUGE DIFFERENCES between retarded idealist physicists
and down to Earth good engineers. But YOU ARE NEITHER, PAUL.
Paul certainly isn't a retarded physicist, and I don't known whether
or not he is an engineer, too.  It's plain, though that Hertz is
neither physicist of any stripe and he's definitely not a good engineer
since he has presented no data to support his baseless assertions.
“Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain, and most fools do.”
-- Benjamin Franklin

Date Sujet#  Auteur
29 Mar 25 * The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.31rhertz
29 Mar 25 +* Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.2rhertz
29 Mar 25 i`- Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.1rhertz
29 Mar 25 +* Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.3Ross Finlayson
30 Mar 25 i`* Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.2Ross Finlayson
30 Mar 25 i `- Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.1rhertz
29 Mar 25 +- Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.1rhertz
30 Mar 25 +- Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.1bertitaylor
30 Mar 25 +- Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.1J. J. Lodder
30 Mar 25 +* Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.16gharnagel
30 Mar 25 i`* Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.15rhertz
31 Mar 25 i +* Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.8gharnagel
31 Mar 25 i i+- Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.1Ross Finlayson
4 Apr20:28 i i`* Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.6Charleton Christakos Dou
4 Apr23:36 i i `* Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.5gharnagel
5 Apr03:49 i i  +* Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.3rhertz
5 Apr04:17 i i  i+- Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
6 Apr15:17 i i  i`- Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.1gharnagel
5 Apr11:02 i i  `- Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.1Reilies Huszár Bian
31 Mar 25 i +- Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.1Thomas Heger
1 Apr20:18 i `* Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.5Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr23:03 i  +- Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.1rhertz
1 Apr23:05 i  `* Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.3rhertz
4 Apr04:48 i   `* Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.2gharnagel
4 Apr08:12 i    `- Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.1Quenton Costantini
2 Apr20:57 `* Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.6Aether Regained
3 Apr06:15  +- Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
3 Apr07:16  `* Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.4Ross Finlayson
3 Apr14:52   +- Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.1Ross Finlayson
3 Apr16:56   `* Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.2Aether Regained
3 Apr22:46    `- Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.1rhertz

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal