Sujet : Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
De : bertietaylor (at) *nospam* myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physicsDate : 04. Apr 2025, 23:38:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Rocksolid Light
Message-ID : <62dec3cc0f66855eb4d0b31740193d37@www.novabbs.org>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 5:55:52 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Freitag000004, 04.04.2025 um 07:24 schrieb Bertitaylor:
On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 5:03:41 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:
>
Stephen Hawking once asked:
>
Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
>
Why did Hawking go on existing?
>
I had actually a theory about that, too.
>
My guess:
>
Hawking didn't use his 'eye controlled speech synthesizer' himself.
>
That was actually done by 'remote control' as was his wheel chair.
>
His own role in that was just to sit there and look ugly.
Just a part of the e=mcc racket. Great drama, negative science.
Woof woof woof-woof
>
>
TH
-- 
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?