Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.

On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 2:49:16 +0000, rhertz wrote:

On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 22:36:13 +0000, gharnagel wrote:
>

On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 19:28:31 +0000, Charleton Christakos Dou wrote:

>
gharnagel wrote:

>
On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 16:55:51 +0000, rhertz wrote:

THE WORLD DEVELOPED THANKS TO INVENTORS AND ENGINEER SINCE SUMERIAN
TIMES, OR MUCH OLDER THAN THAT.

>
Yeah, engineers who believe in conservation of energy and momentum )

>
not true. You cannot conserve energy. It would leak out. It always leaks
out, sooner or later.

>
Yep, it's called radiation.  Engineers and scientists measure it all the
time.  Energy from the sun impinges on the earth, some is reflected back
into space, some is absorbed and some heats up the earth.  Fortunately,
the warmer earth sends more infrared energy back into space.  Otherwise,
we would all be roasted.  Conservation of energy means that earth
reaches
an equilibrium temperature.  It's a simple differential equation.  You
DO
understand simple calculus, don't you?

>
>
There are so many institutions working on this subject for decades that
you wouldn't believe, simpleton. And they are using supercomputers to
try to get EVEN AN APPROXIMATION to the complex models developed to
figure out what would happen in the next hour, day or week, and THEY
CONSTANTLY FAIL MISERABLY.
>
There are no SIMPLE differential equations to model climate, nor even
complex sets of N-Dimensional matrixes, with algorithms and software
that need constant real time feed of information gathered by vast arrays
of sensors, satellites, etc., that make the general problem to predict
the BALANCE OF ENERGY IMPOSSIBLE TO BE SOLVED.
>
Not only the many influences of the Sun on Earth, but MUCH MORE
INFLUENCES from the Earth itself, that make the problem UNSOLVABLE.
>
Earth's rotation, dragging air and water in non-linear spiral patterns
plus the influence of the many layers of Earth's mantles on the oceans,
in particular due to breaks in the Earth's upper layer that let inner
Earth to warm up oceans, creating phenomena (El Niño, La Niña, etc.)
that affect the climate worldwide.
>
Add to these HOLES in the Earth's atmosphere that allow heat to come in
and to get out under several forms (like radiant power, atoms,
molecules) that come and go to the outer space.
>
And about this HUGE COMPLEXITY of modelling the atmospheric variables,
all what you say is that a High School differential equation solve this?
>
>
You are more stupid than what I thought once. An idiot without cure.
>
>
What THE FUCK do you know about energy transformation and conservation
on Earth?
>
Earth behaves as a living organism, with secrets BEYOND OUR
COMPREHENSION, imbecile, and there is no science to prove that LCE works
here, even for an instant.

The Milankiovitch climate model is the best they can do to attempt to
explain the cause of the Ice Ages but it has always failed. It is
generally recognized that the "100,000 year problem" prevents it from
ever explaining the cause. They stick with the arbitrary and jiggered
model even though it has never come close to explaining it. The
eccentricity cycle is the 100,000 year one and it is by far the weakest
effect (of 3 main ones) that is alleged to cause the major Ice Ages.