Re: Muon paradox

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Muon paradox
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 05. Apr 2025, 20:14:02
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <dwWdnTSSG_FgHWz6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
On 04/05/2025 12:01 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 05.04.2025 20:57, skrev Paul.B.Andersen:
Muons are created by collisions between cosmic rays at ~15 km,
and will after the creation have an initial energy ~ 6 GeV
which is equivalent to a speed ~ 0.999845g1 ⋅c.
>
which is equivalent to a speed ~ 0.999845⋅c
>
Of course, muon physics in that framework of SR's after
mass-energy equivalency and that the nuclear radiation
which is for various models of nuclear theory including
both the nucleonic and hadronic, and with regards to
mass-equivalency and also charge-equivalency with regards
to the ionizing radiation, or for alpha and beta "particles",
has that muons are basically going in the other direction,
yet there's no way for SR to say that, so it's up to other
fields where among electron physics, hadron physics, muon physics,
and neutrino physics, that among the electric and photonic, and
the nuclear and electric, and the nuclear and nuclear, and the
nuclear and nuclear, have that the fields of physics _underneath_
the equivalencies, have _inequivalencies_, about the post recently
where there was sort of broken out E and the F's.
"... which is equivalent to a mass-equivalent ~ 0.999845 infinity"
Super-symmetry not only isn't dead, it doesn't even
entirely belong to hadron physics.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
31 Mar 25 * Muon paradox138LaurenceClarkCrossen
31 Mar 25 +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
31 Mar 25 +* Re: Muon paradox21LaurenceClarkCrossen
31 Mar 25 i`* Re: Muon paradox20LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i `* Re: Muon paradox19Richard Hachel
1 Apr 25 i  +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i  +* Re: Muon paradox3LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i  i`* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i  i `- Re: Muon paradox1Ross Finlayson
1 Apr 25 i  `* Re: Muon paradox14guido wugi
1 Apr 25 i   +* Re: Muon paradox2Richard Hachel
1 Apr 25 i   i`- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i   +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i   +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i   `* Re: Muon paradox9LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i    `* Re: Muon paradox8Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr 25 i     +* Re: Muon paradox3Ross Finlayson
1 Apr 25 i     i`* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i     i `- Re: Muon paradox1Ross Finlayson
1 Apr 25 i     `* Re: Muon paradox4LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr 25 i      `* Re: Muon paradox3Paul.B.Andersen
2 Apr 25 i       +- Re: Muon paradox1Rubin Yablokov
2 Apr 25 i       `- Re: Muon paradox1Ross Finlayson
1 Apr 25 +* Re: Muon paradox10LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i`* Re: Muon paradox9Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr 25 i +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i `* Re: Muon paradox7LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr 25 i  `* Re: Muon paradox6Paul.B.Andersen
2 Apr 25 i   +- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
2 Apr 25 i   `* Re: Muon paradox4LaurenceClarkCrossen
3 Apr 25 i    `* Re: Muon paradox3Paul.B.Andersen
3 Apr 25 i     +- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr 25 i     `- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 +* Re: Muon paradox99Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr 25 i+- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
1 Apr 25 i+* Re: Muon paradox6Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr 25 ii+* Re: Muon paradox2Maciej Wozniak
1 Apr 25 iii`- Re: Muon paradox1Edilberto Gayazov
1 Apr 25 ii+- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 ii`* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr 25 ii `- Re: Muon paradox1Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr 25 i+* Re: Muon paradox54LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr 25 ii`* Re: Muon paradox53Paul.B.Andersen
2 Apr 25 ii +* Re: Muon paradox15LaurenceClarkCrossen
3 Apr 25 ii i`* Re: Muon paradox14Paul.B.Andersen
3 Apr 25 ii i +* Re: Muon paradox12Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr 25 ii i i`* Re: Muon paradox11Darling Vassilopulos
3 Apr 25 ii i i `* Re: Muon paradox10Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr 25 ii i i  `* Re: Muon paradox9Richard Hachel
3 Apr 25 ii i i   +* Re: Muon paradox3LaurenceClarkCrossen
4 Apr 25 ii i i   i`* Re: Muon paradox2Richard Hachel
5 Apr 25 ii i i   i `- Re: Muon paradox1Thomas Heger
4 Apr 25 ii i i   +* Re: Muon paradox3Thomas Heger
4 Apr 25 ii i i   i+- Re: Muon paradox1Richard Hachel
5 Apr 25 ii i i   i`- Re: Muon paradox1Thomas Heger
4 Apr 25 ii i i   `* Re: Muon paradox2Richard Hachel
4 Apr 25 ii i i    `- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr 25 ii i `- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr 25 ii +* Re: Muon paradox2Aether Regained
2 Apr 25 ii i`- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr 25 ii `* Re: Muon paradox35LaurenceClarkCrossen
3 Apr 25 ii  `* Re: Muon paradox34Paul.B.Andersen
3 Apr 25 ii   +- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr 25 ii   +* Re: Muon paradox31LaurenceClarkCrossen
4 Apr 25 ii   i`* Re: Muon paradox30Paul.B.Andersen
4 Apr 25 ii   i +* Re: Muon paradox3Maciej Wozniak
4 Apr 25 ii   i i`* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr 25 ii   i i `- Re: Muon paradox1Richard Hachel
4 Apr 25 ii   i +* Re: Muon paradox11LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr 25 ii   i i`* Re: Muon paradox10Paul.B.Andersen
5 Apr 25 ii   i i +- Re: Muon paradox1Richard Hachel
5 Apr 25 ii   i i +* Re: Muon paradox7LaurenceClarkCrossen
6 Apr 25 ii   i i i`* Re: Muon paradox6Paul.B.Andersen
6 Apr 25 ii   i i i +* Re: Muon paradox3LaurenceClarkCrossen
7 Apr 25 ii   i i i i`* Re: Muon paradox2Paul.B.Andersen
7 Apr 25 ii   i i i i `- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
7 Apr 25 ii   i i i `* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
7 Apr 25 ii   i i i  `- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
6 Apr 25 ii   i i `- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
5 Apr 25 ii   i `* Re: Muon paradox15Paul.B.Andersen
5 Apr 25 ii   i  +* Re: Muon paradox6Paul.B.Andersen
5 Apr 25 ii   i  i+- Re: Muon paradox1Ross Finlayson
5 Apr 25 ii   i  i+- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr 25 ii   i  i+- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr 25 ii   i  i+- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr 25 ii   i  i`- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr 25 ii   i  `* Re: Muon paradox8LaurenceClarkCrossen
6 Apr 25 ii   i   `* Re: Muon paradox7Paul.B.Andersen
6 Apr 25 ii   i    +* Re: Muon paradox4Richard Hachel
6 Apr 25 ii   i    i+- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
7 Apr 25 ii   i    i`* Re: Muon paradox2Thomas Heger
7 Apr 25 ii   i    i `- Re: Muon paradox1Richard Hachel
6 Apr 25 ii   i    +- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
7 Apr 25 ii   i    `- Re: Muon paradox1Paul.B.Andersen
3 Apr 25 ii   `- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i+- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
9 Apr 25 i+* Re: Muon paradox4gharnagel
9 Apr 25 ii`* Re: Muon paradox3Paul.B.Andersen
9 Apr 25 ii `* Re: Muon paradox2gharnagel
10 Apr 25 ii  `- Re: Muon paradox1Shirley Dovgusha
10 Apr 25 i`* Re: Muon paradox32Aether Regained
1 Apr 25 +* Re: Muon paradox3Kent Bazhukov
8 Apr 25 `* Re: Muon paradox3Maciej Wozniak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal