Re: Muon paradox

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Muon paradox
De : relativity (at) *nospam* paulba.no (Paul.B.Andersen)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 06. Apr 2025, 14:15:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vstug7$u0ts$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Den 05.04.2025 23:01, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 18:57:33 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
L = γ⋅v⋅τ₀ = 14.178 km (the muon will decay before it hits the ground)
>
Conclusion:
In this scenario, there is but one single muon with one single life.
The muon lives from its creation to its decay.
This single life is measured to last 1 μs in the muon frame K,
and is measured to last 47.3 μs in the Earth-frame K'.
>
Time dilation is the phenomenon that the measured time
between two events on an object's world-line depend
on the frame of reference in which it is measured.
>
So this is "time dilation" by definition.
>
And as you know, the phenomenon "time dilation"
is thoroughly proven to exist in the real world.
>
It simply is how Mother Nature works.
>
You have obviously not read my post since you can make idiotic
remarks like below.

For the muon to travel 6,000 meters, its lifetime must be 22
microseconds.
To assert otherwise is irrational.
This is natural science.
Right above I wrote:
"This single life is measured to last 1 μs in the muon frame K,
  and is measured to last 47.3 μs in the Earth-frame K'."
In 47.3 μs the muon will travel 14.178 km in the Earth-frame.
----------------------------
I will post it again. Please read it this time.
And make one reply, where you quote what you respond to.
If you think something is wrong specify exactly what, and quote
what you think is wrong.
| "Time dilation" is predicted by SR.
|
| Let's see how:
|
| As you know, a muon may decay at any time. (it's radioactive decay)
| The proper mean lifetime is 2.2 μs. This means that if we know
| the muon exists, then the probability that it still will exist
| after 1 μs is exp(-1e-6/2.2e-6) = 0.63. That means that the probability
| that the muon will decay after less than 1 μs  is 0.27.
|
| We will define that the muon we are going to analyse decays exactly
| τ₀ = 1 μs after its creation, measured in the muon's rest frame.
| The speed of the muon in the Earth frame is v = 0.999776⋅c, γ = 47.3
A comment:
A vast number of muons are created every second,
so there will always be some muons which have
a proper lifetime close to 1 μs.
|
| We will use two frames of references:
| The muon frame K(x,t) and the Earth-frame K'(x',c').
| The muon frame is moving at the speed v relative to the Earth-frame.
| The muon is created 15 km above ground, we will set this event to
| have the coordinates in K': x₀'= 0, t₀'= 0
| and the coordinates in  K:  x₀ = 0, t₀ = 0
| The muon is stationary at x₀ = 0
|
| event creation:  t₀'= 0, t₀ = 0
|
| K':------|--------------------------------|----> x'
|     x₀'= 0                                15 km (ground)
|
| K: ------M------------------------------------> x  v->
|     x₀ = 0
|
| ================================
|
| event decay:
|
| K':------|-------------------------|------|----> x'
|     x₀'= 0                    x₁'= L      15 km (ground)
|
| K: --------------------------------M-----------> x  v->
|                               x₁ = 0
|
| When the muon decays, the coordinates  are
| In K:  x₁ = 0,  t₁ = τ₀
| In K':
|  L = x₁'= γ(x₁ + v⋅t₁) = γ⋅v⋅τ₀
|  t₁'= γ(t₁ + v⋅x₁/c²) =  γ⋅τ₀
|
| Putting in numbers:
| L = γ⋅v⋅τ₀ = 14.177 km (the muon will decay before it hits the ground)
| t₁'= γ⋅τ₀ = 47.3 μs
| t₁ = τ₀ = 1 μs
|
| Conclusion:
| In this scenario, there is but one single muon with one single life.
| The muon lives from its creation to its decay.
| This single life is measured to last 1 μs in the muon frame K,
| and is measured to last 47.3 μs in the Earth-frame K'.
|
| Time dilation is the phenomenon that the measured time
| between two events on an object's world-line depend
| on the frame of reference in which it is measured.
|
| So this is "time dilation" by definition.
|
| And as you know, the phenomenon "time dilation"
| is thoroughly proven to exist in the real world.
|
| It simply is how Mother Nature works.
--
Paul
https://paulba.no/

Date Sujet#  Auteur
31 Mar 25 * Muon paradox88LaurenceClarkCrossen
31 Mar 25 +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
31 Mar 25 +* Re: Muon paradox21LaurenceClarkCrossen
31 Mar 25 i`* Re: Muon paradox20LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i `* Re: Muon paradox19Richard Hachel
1 Apr 25 i  +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i  +* Re: Muon paradox3LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr18:49 i  i`* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr19:01 i  i `- Re: Muon paradox1Ross Finlayson
1 Apr 25 i  `* Re: Muon paradox14guido wugi
1 Apr 25 i   +* Re: Muon paradox2Richard Hachel
1 Apr18:38 i   i`- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr16:24 i   +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr16:31 i   +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr16:38 i   `* Re: Muon paradox9LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr19:26 i    `* Re: Muon paradox8Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr19:41 i     +* Re: Muon paradox3Ross Finlayson
1 Apr20:24 i     i`* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr23:56 i     i `- Re: Muon paradox1Ross Finlayson
1 Apr20:12 i     `* Re: Muon paradox4LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr08:45 i      `* Re: Muon paradox3Paul.B.Andersen
2 Apr10:13 i       +- Re: Muon paradox1Rubin Yablokov
2 Apr17:45 i       `- Re: Muon paradox1Ross Finlayson
1 Apr18:42 +* Re: Muon paradox10LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr19:38 i`* Re: Muon paradox9Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr20:15 i +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr22:24 i `* Re: Muon paradox7LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr10:45 i  `* Re: Muon paradox6Paul.B.Andersen
2 Apr12:33 i   +- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
2 Apr18:46 i   `* Re: Muon paradox4LaurenceClarkCrossen
3 Apr09:18 i    `* Re: Muon paradox3Paul.B.Andersen
3 Apr09:39 i     +- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr21:51 i     `- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr18:56 +* Re: Muon paradox52Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr19:17 i+- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
1 Apr19:44 i+* Re: Muon paradox6Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr19:54 ii+* Re: Muon paradox2Maciej Wozniak
1 Apr22:26 iii`- Re: Muon paradox1Edilberto Gayazov
1 Apr20:19 ii+- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr22:42 ii`* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr09:21 ii `- Re: Muon paradox1Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr20:06 i+* Re: Muon paradox43LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr11:00 ii`* Re: Muon paradox42Paul.B.Andersen
2 Apr18:58 ii +* Re: Muon paradox15LaurenceClarkCrossen
3 Apr09:18 ii i`* Re: Muon paradox14Paul.B.Andersen
3 Apr09:40 ii i +* Re: Muon paradox12Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr19:50 ii i i`* Re: Muon paradox11Darling Vassilopulos
3 Apr20:51 ii i i `* Re: Muon paradox10Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr23:03 ii i i  `* Re: Muon paradox9Richard Hachel
3 Apr23:58 ii i i   +* Re: Muon paradox3LaurenceClarkCrossen
4 Apr12:49 ii i i   i`* Re: Muon paradox2Richard Hachel
5 Apr08:37 ii i i   i `- Re: Muon paradox1Thomas Heger
4 Apr06:48 ii i i   +* Re: Muon paradox3Thomas Heger
4 Apr13:02 ii i i   i+- Re: Muon paradox1Richard Hachel
5 Apr08:31 ii i i   i`- Re: Muon paradox1Thomas Heger
4 Apr13:13 ii i i   `* Re: Muon paradox2Richard Hachel
4 Apr13:41 ii i i    `- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr21:54 ii i `- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr20:32 ii +* Re: Muon paradox2Aether Regained
2 Apr22:33 ii i`- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr22:33 ii `* Re: Muon paradox24LaurenceClarkCrossen
3 Apr09:39 ii  `* Re: Muon paradox23Paul.B.Andersen
3 Apr09:43 ii   +- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr21:56 ii   +* Re: Muon paradox20LaurenceClarkCrossen
4 Apr13:55 ii   i`* Re: Muon paradox19Paul.B.Andersen
4 Apr14:49 ii   i +* Re: Muon paradox3Maciej Wozniak
4 Apr23:11 ii   i i`* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr15:57 ii   i i `- Re: Muon paradox1Richard Hachel
4 Apr22:15 ii   i +* Re: Muon paradox5LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr10:32 ii   i i`* Re: Muon paradox4Paul.B.Andersen
5 Apr13:00 ii   i i +- Re: Muon paradox1Richard Hachel
5 Apr21:53 ii   i i +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
6 Apr06:03 ii   i i `- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
5 Apr19:57 ii   i `* Re: Muon paradox10Paul.B.Andersen
5 Apr20:01 ii   i  +* Re: Muon paradox6Paul.B.Andersen
5 Apr20:14 ii   i  i+- Re: Muon paradox1Ross Finlayson
5 Apr22:03 ii   i  i+- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr22:55 ii   i  i+- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr23:15 ii   i  i+- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr23:46 ii   i  i`- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr22:01 ii   i  `* Re: Muon paradox3LaurenceClarkCrossen
6 Apr14:15 ii   i   `* Re: Muon paradox2Paul.B.Andersen
6 Apr14:51 ii   i    `- Re: Muon paradox1Richard Hachel
3 Apr22:37 ii   `- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr23:02 i`- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr22:08 `* Re: Muon paradox3Kent Bazhukov
1 Apr22:21  `* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr23:01   `- Re: Muon paradox1Lane Babenkov

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal