Re: Muon paradox

W dniu 07.04.2025 o 01:30, LaurenceClarkCrossen pisze:

On Sun, 6 Apr 2025 20:09:28 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
 

W dniu 06.04.2025 o 22:02, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:

Den 05.04.2025 22:53, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:

Your calculations do not explain the cause.
>
SR cannot predict without a cause, and you haven't given the cause.

>
Everything SR predicts is a consequence of the postulates of SR.
What other "cause" do you want?
>
But SR doesn't _cause_ anything. That it predicts exactly what
is measured means that SR is not falsified by muon experiments.

>
Too bad it's only measured in some sick
imagination of a brainwashed idiot.

I must say I find the whole matter quite perplexing.
 I thought time dilation was an effect not a cause.
 I am told a muon in its own frame lasts one microsecond yet covers the
distance requiring 22.

You're told. Nothing supports this wildassertion and a muon doesn't even have
a frame (thanks to the nonsenses of QM).
Most of "measurements" a relativistic idiot
is invoking have never been performed - the
idiot has only imagined them. The ones
that have really been performed - well, they
were prepared to give the correct result...
a measurement is always prepared to that.