Re: Muon paradox

Am Sonntag000006, 06.04.2025 um 15:51 schrieb Richard Hachel:

Le 06/04/2025 à 15:10, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :

Conclusion:
In this scenario, there is but one single muon with one single life.
The muon lives from its creation to its decay.
This single life is measured to last 1 μs in the muon frame K,
and is measured to last 47.3 μs in the Earth-frame K'.
>
Time dilation is the phenomenon that the measured time
between two events on an object's world-line depend
on the frame of reference in which it is measured.
>
So this is "time dilation" by definition.
>
And as you know, the phenomenon "time dilation"
is thoroughly proven to exist in the real world.
>
It simply is how Mother Nature works.
>

 The hardest thing for the novice to understand is that this phenomenon is reciprocal.
 For the muon, a phenomenon that occurs in the laboratory for 1 µs would last for him...
 This confuses the novice.
 He doesn't understand how this can work.

This works, if we would give up the very idea of particles altogether, but regard a muon as a certain moving state.
It's easier the other way round and start with a photon.
A photon is supposed to be a 'thing', while it actually belongs to wave as certain 'pattern'.
What would happen to a photon, if we could suddenly stop it?
Well, we know from experience, that isolated metal plates become charged, if we shine light upon them.
So, a photon in full stop is (after being stopped) an electron.
Or the other way round: there are no particles as real lasting entities, but only certain waves, which behave under certain circumstances like a particle.
Now an exotic wave shows up at a laboratory on the surface of planet Earth and hits a metal plate (or whatever else) and then turns into something, that decays in a microsecond.
The atmosphere  is less hard, hence make that wave decay in ~90 microseconds.

 But we can't blame them; the bigwigs are just as lost when Doctor Hachel starts talking about modern relativity theory. They can't understand that when Stella makes her U-turn, over there, at 12 ly, and returns to Earth at 0.8c (the Langevin traveler), she is stationary in her frame of reference but sees the Earth coming back towards her, with an apparent speed of 4c, for 9 years (so far, so good). And THEREFORE, she sees the Earth coming back towards her over a distance of 36 light-years (inverse distance contraction).
 This drives them all crazy.

Well, I don't really like SRT.
I think, that SRT is actually a very convoluted way to calculate the Doppler effect.
TH