Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics

W dniu 07.04.2025 o 19:17, Benito Grünewald pisze:

Maciej Wozniak wrote:
 

That implies knowing solar days exactly. Here more to undrestand
seconds. The mechanics of it.
????? ???? ????? ?? ? ?????????? ?? ???????
https://%42i%74%43hute.com/vi%44eo/lgGMsNdPNANx

>
It helps even more to understand that the particular definition of any
unit of time is completely irrelevant for any kind of physics. Physical
results cannot depend on it, by definition,

>
Can't they? By definition? By WHAT definition, poor trash?
Anyway, they absolutely do. And you're a reality denier, as expected
from a relativistic idiot.

 please be careful, I can see now he is also wrong, but no reason to apply
insults. I hate insults.

You're a troll on the leash of a piece of shit
from Moscow, why would anyone care what you
hate or not.

Time is not about definitions, since it's a
dimension

It absolutely is about definitions, since it's
a dimension. All abstracts are about definitions.