Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics

Le 08/04/2025 à 20:22, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :

D = √((1+v/c)/(1−v/c)).

 This equation is entirely correct theoretically and completely logical experimentally.
 What has always amazed me, for several years now, is that I have remained one of the few to fully trust it, even though the observed effects can sometimes be frankly counterintuitive.
 I remind you, once again, why I remain the best relativistic theorist of all time (not by my own strength, because I based my work on my predecessors, and I confirm that the mathematician Henri Poincaré was the greatest and the true founding father of the theory); I am the only one who doesn't tremble when writing what he writes:
All the others start to tremble if I ask them how far the Earth is from Stella's spacecraft, when Stella has just made its U-turn, over there, at Tau Ceti, and is now traveling towards Earth at 0.8c.
The boldest try to answer 7.2 ly, because they assume a contraction of distances.
All the others run away, knowing that I will ask them how Stella will be able to see the Earth moving towards her for 9 years, with an apparent speed of 4c (which is the apparent approach speed of v=0.8c).
No one has ever been able to respond to me except with insults, professional defamation, and threats, even a death threat.
Everyone is disoriented by the fact that I apply the principle to the fullest, and the equation to the fullest, without this detracting from the superb beauty of relativistic theory.
In the example given:
 D = √((1+v/c)/(1−v/c))=36ly.  There's no problem with logic or consistency here. Only the limited and fearful minds of my opponents, afraid of the consequences of a possible acceptance.
They would have to tell themselves that good old Dr. Hachel isn't that stupid, and that drives them crazy.
R.H.