Sujet : Re: Acceleration.
De : bertietaylor (at) *nospam* myyahoo.com (bertitaylor)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 18. Apr 2025, 15:00:36
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Rocksolid Light
Message-ID : <e20a5fa01f94c30873dac526c051ccae@www.novabbs.org>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 16:19:00 +0000, Ross Finlayson wrote:
On 04/15/2025 01:32 PM, kinak wrote:
>
'Acceleration' might mean 'circular motion'
There is such a thing called angular acceleration.
>
Well, the world is turning, and Archimedes and his lever
always must have a place to stand, so one may aver that
dynamics of any sort is always, "un-linear", and that only
in the abstract mental geometry is the, "linear",
that it may always be, "un-linear".
Linear means going in a line, and there is such a thing as accelerating
along a line, where a line is defined in this sense is defined as the
shortest distance between two points.
>
Einstein in one of his last books writes another derivation
of the mass-energy equivalency about the "centrally symmetric".
Bullshit alert.
It's sort of called "Einstein's bridge", and what it does is
make it so that the dynamics is always, "un-linear", in the
abstract mental geometry of the, "linear".
Bullshit++.
The fact of the Earth being circular does not rule out linearity, but
the e=mcc frauds make much of it.
>
Most people don't know it mostly since they're not taught it.
Yet, it's there.
Frauds rule these days.
Woof woof
Bertietaylor
--