Re: I asked ChatGPT to prove that Hafele-Keating 1971 experiment was A HOAX.

On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 3:42:29 +0000, Ross Finlayson wrote:

>
On 04/29/2025 05:55 PM, rhertz wrote:

>
An incredible hoax, with the complicity of academia, publishing
houses and establishment.

Not a hoax.  Although ChatGPT suggested alternative explanations
for muon lifetime extension, it admitted that it was consistent
with the time dilation explanation.

To hype the figure of Einstein and his theories was a very well
rewarded job in the '50s, '60s and '70s for opportunist scums like
Pound, Shapiro, Hafele and many others.
>
And this has been happening since 1919, with Eddington.
>
ChatGPT offered to me to debunk any major paper or experiment
"proving" relativity up to these days.

I find the AI discourse rather shallow.  There were no mentions of
more recent experiments which support relativity not at all dependent
on muons:
https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2010/09/nist-pair-aluminum-atomic-clocks-reveal-einsteins-relativity-personal-scale
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5253894/
"Relativity in the Global Positioning System"
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature01997
"A test of general relativity using radio links with the Cassini
spacecraft"

It seems that the AI entity find it amusing, so his proposals
were endless, like to disprove LIGO, Compton, Eddington,
Hawking's radiation on black holes, the very existence of
black holes, etc.
>
I could write a book with the material that ChatGPT provided
to me. It imposed only one condition: not to call them HOAX,
but to present conflicting facts that disproved famous "sacred
cows" of relativity. You only had to explain what was your
intentions and which were the starting points that made me a
non-believer. Then, it cooperated.

>
Gravitational singularities rather exist, even if as regards to
the "cosmic censorship" or "raw singularities", the wobbles as
they may be result an unboundedly large concentration even if
with a vanishingly small extent or duration.

Singularities only appear in theories, not in reality.  Their
presence indicates that the theory has exceeded its domain of
applicability.

Gravitational waves like LIGO and others like Weber bars
do detect gravitational waves, or rather, the tail end
of them, with regards to the instantaneous formation of
gravitational waves.

I thought Weber never detected them.  Ah, he claimed to have
detected them but no one else was able to reproduce them.
https://www.science.org/content/article/remembering-joseph-weber-controversial-pioneer-gravitational-waves

There are a variety of Compton effects, that Eddington
isn't saying much. Hawking is all over the place.
>
Higgs boson is outside the standard model of course.
>
Hafaele-Keating picked a careful circuit in terms of
that the configuration and energy of experiment of
the day wasn't just an oscillator they could strap
into a passenger flight seat, yet also quite the
many regularly scheduled flights they could pick from
to go around the right way.
>
Eotvos really did spin freely, after it lined up right,
much like Michelson-Morley, after it came to rest,
as according to what Foucault says, and a bit of Allais.
>
Pound-Rebka and the rubidium laser bit, has those are pumped.
>
The trick of these experiments is to actually validate usual
GR and QM in very contrived configurations and energies of
experiment, because there are lots of configurations and
at least something has to result, the, "classical limit".
>
Then that most people have no idea about the difference of
these is because they're not figuring it out for themselves.
>
Most have never even heard of that NIST CODATA measures the
theoretical particle every few years, and it gets smaller,
and the age of the universe, and it gets larger.