Re: t and t'

Le 30/04/2025 à 16:32, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :

On 4/30/2025 3:29 PM, Python wrote:

Le 30/04/2025 à 07:22, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :

What do these variables represent?

 Nice to see that you admit that you don't know what you are babbling about.

 A lie, of course, as expected from a relativistic
piece of shit in genaral and from you especially.>

Follow a physics course, you'll know then.

 You've followed and you don't.

Henri Poincaré was right.
The greatest mathematician in history was French.
But he wasn't content with being a mathematician; he encompassed the entirety of the philosophy and physics of his time.
What did Henri Poincaré say?
That time was relative, that spaces were relative.
That energy was relative, according to E=mc²/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²).
Which, incidentally, meant that if Vo=0, then E=mc².
This is what Poincaré had already established in 1900, just as he had already established in early 1905, all the equations of special relativity.
Derived from his extraordinary transformations, called Lorentz transformations, to please Hendrick.
He was right.
The question, therefore, is not, "was he right or not?"
The question is: "But what happened?"
What happened?
This Mr. Einstein, who was considered incapable of solving a quadratic equation at 18, and who had to be sent as a simple copyist to Bern (where he copied patents), how could he have ended up being nominated as the greatest mind of the century, by copying the work that Poincaré sent to Bern, and signing the footnotes in his place?
Worse, by distorting his thoughts and diverting them, rather than taking them further.
All of this is incomprehensible.
R.H.