Re: Old vs new

Le 04/05/2025 à 10:38, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :

On 5/4/2025 9:43 AM, Python wrote:
 > Le 04/05/2025 à 09:27, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :
 >> On 4/10/2025 10:41 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
 >>
 >>  > GPS clocks are adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10)
 >>  > so the adjusted clock will measure a mean solar day
 >>  > to last 86400 s, and the clock will stay in sync with UTC.
 >>
 >> Well, if you "observe" dilating time - it's
 >> not because your idiot guru has caught God's
 >> balls, it's because he has inspired you to
 >> invent  a brandly new method of counting time.
 >>
 >> Now: as your method is not only brandly new,
 >> but also utterly idiotic - nobody really
 >> wants to count time your way. Even you,
 >> yourself are not really THAT stupid.
 >>
 >> And time counted the old way doesn't want to
 >> dilate. Too  bad.
 >
 > Why  1 - 4.4647e-10 and not another value for every given satellite?
 >
 >
 Because another value wouldn't work.

Paraphrasing the question in not an answer. Because it is so is not an answer also.
Why "another value wouldn't work" ?
Why this value exactly (that is, btw, predicted by GR) ?
Moreover why a single value matches for all satellites ?