Re: Old vs new

Le 04/05/2025 à 20:44, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :

On 5/4/2025 8:10 PM, Python wrote:
 > Le 04/05/2025 à 10:38, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :
 >> On 5/4/2025 9:43 AM, Python wrote:
 >>  > Le 04/05/2025 à 09:27, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :
 >>  >> On 4/10/2025 10:41 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
 >>  >>
 >>  >>  > GPS clocks are adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10)
 >>  >>  > so the adjusted clock will measure a mean solar day
 >>  >>  > to last 86400 s, and the clock will stay in sync with UTC.
 >>  >>
 >>  >> Well, if you "observe" dilating time - it's
 >>  >> not because your idiot guru has caught God's
 >>  >> balls, it's because he has inspired you to
 >>  >> invent  a brandly new method of counting time.
 >>  >>
 >>  >> Now: as your method is not only brandly new,
 >>  >> but also utterly idiotic - nobody really
 >>  >> wants to count time your way. Even you,
 >>  >> yourself are not really THAT stupid.
 >>  >>
 >>  >> And time counted the old way doesn't want to
 >>  >> dilate. Too  bad.
 >>  >
 >>  > Why  1 - 4.4647e-10 and not another value for every given satellite?
 >>  >
 >>  >
 >>
 >> Because another value wouldn't work.
 >
 > Paraphrasing the question in not an answer.
 Cutting off another question and pretending
not to notice it is not an answer too
   Because it is so is not an
 > answer also.
 >
 > Why "another value wouldn't work" ?

Why the same value of each and every satellite?

No answer? No surprise :-)

 > Why this value exactly (that is, btw, predicted by GR) ?

A lie, of course, according to The Shit
(and the whole of your moronic religion)
clocks should be SI, not (1 - 4.4647e-10)
of SI.

Not a lie. BTW, you are the liar (as usual) here.

poor stinker.

Nice signature.