Re: The proof of Noether theorem

On Mon, 5 May 2025 11:51:28 +0000, Ross Finlayson wrote:

On 05/04/2025 11:55 PM, Maciej Woźniak wrote:

Well, Pythagorean theorem had about
120 proofs - and is still [allegedly]
not valid  for the world we inhabit.
>
So, how about Noether theorem? Proven
or not, the question whether it is valid
should still be open I guess?

>
It's really simple and follows from Pauli principle.

It is fraud.

>
I.e., that one thing cannot be in two different places.

Not at the same time.

>
So, it's often represented as that two quantities
have the same sum, "conservation", simply as of
after about a symmetry, "same difference" on both
sides, any what's an "invariant".

Word salad, meaningless rubbish, fraud.

>
The, "continuity" law is often written rather
simply, "equals zero", so of course the "conservation"
and "continuity" laws are inextricable.

Rubbish from rubbish with ridiculous word salad.

>
Then, "continuity" law can also be written as
"conservation" law, and vice versa.

Rubbish.

>
Then, a usual idea in extended bodies is that
it's more properly, "continuity law".

Rubbish.
Misuse of words. Sad.
Woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--