Sujet : Re: Should we synchronize clocks?
De : mlwozniak (at) *nospam* wp.pl (Maciej Woźniak)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 06. May 2026, 03:18:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-ID : <183e348c33e7fbdd$1031803$1819595$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/10/2025 3:23 PM, Python wrote:
> Le 10/05/2025 à 11:40, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :
>> Time is what clocks indicate.
>>
>> If we synchronize clocks - they're
>> indicating t'=t; that's what clock
>> synchronization means.
>
> This looks like a very fuzzy definition.
Doesn't look like any definition for me.
> Of course if both clocks are broken i.e. are stopped I could compare two constants values, but it would be pointless
Right, it would be.
>> We can do it - that doesn't have to
>> be obvious or easy, but that's definitely
>> something we can manage in most
>> circumstances (with a good accuracy).
>
> Could you describe at least one way to do it in a simple case? And how to check accuracy of the applied procedure?
Why won't you check GPS documentation for
that.
| Date | Sujet | # | | Auteur |
| 6 May 26 | … | | | |
Haut de la page
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.
NewsPortal